Synchronous Solid-State Relay Zero-Crossing Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Synchronous solid-state relays in wireless switches face issues with phase inconsistency between voltage and current, leading to arc formation and electromagnetic interference when the switch is opened at a non-zero-crossing point, reducing relay lifespan and causing damage.

Innovation Solution

A system with a master control unit (MCU) that detects voltage and current zero crossing states using voltage and current collection units, ensuring the relay opens and closes at optimal zero-crossing points to prevent arc formation, incorporating an AC-to-DC power converter and a button unit for command execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a synchronous solid-state relay is used to minimize surge current at voltage zero-crossing, then power delivery control is improved, but phase inconsistency between voltage and current causes arc formation and electromagnetic interference when opening at non-zero-crossing points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelay lifespanVSAvoidelectromagnetic interference
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring both voltage and current waveforms through detection circuits. The control unit receives real-time signals about the actual voltage and current states, compares them with reference zero-crossing points, and adjusts the relay switching timing accordingly. This closed-loop feedback ensures the relay opens and closes at the optimal zero-crossing moment, preventing arc formation and electromagnetic interference while extending relay lifespan.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit performs preliminary detection and analysis of the voltage and current waveforms before executing the relay switching action. By anticipating the zero-crossing points through advance detection and preparing the switching command in advance, the system ensures that the relay operates precisely at the optimal moment, avoiding harmful arcs and electromagnetic interference that would occur with delayed or mistimed switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Speed

If the relay opens at a non-zero-crossing point to respond quickly to control commands, then response speed is improved, but arc formation occurs causing electromagnetic interference and damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelay response speedVSAvoidarc formation
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit continuously monitors voltage and current waveforms in advance, pre-identifying upcoming zero-crossing points. When a control command arrives, the system has already prepared by detecting the next optimal switching moment, enabling rapid response without waiting for the zero-crossing event to occur naturally. This preliminary detection maintains fast response speed while ensuring switching occurs at the safe zero-crossing point, preventing arc formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The real-time feedback from voltage and current detection circuits allows the control unit to dynamically adjust the switching timing based on actual waveform conditions. This feedback mechanism ensures that even under varying load conditions or command timing, the relay switches precisely at the optimal zero-crossing point, maintaining both fast response and arc-free operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Loss of energy

If voltage zero-crossing detection is used for relay switching, then surge current is minimized, but current zero-crossing alignment is not ensured causing phase inconsistency issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurge currentVSAvoidphase synchronization
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges voltage detection and current detection functions into a unified control framework. Both voltage zero-crossing and current zero-crossing information are collected and analyzed together by the control unit, which synthesizes this combined information to determine the optimal switching moment. This merging ensures that both voltage and current phase relationships are considered, achieving phase synchronization while minimizing surge current.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit uses feedback from both voltage and current detection circuits to continuously monitor the phase relationship between voltage and current. By comparing the actual phase difference with the desired synchronization, the system adjusts the switching timing to maintain proper phase alignment. This dual-feedback mechanism ensures both surge current minimization and phase synchronization are achieved simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11049386B2Switch with current and voltage collection
Publication Date: 2021.06.29 EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD
  • US11049386B2 patent drawing
  • US11049386B2 patent drawing
  • US11049386B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for controlling delivery of power to a load includes a master control unit (MCU) and a synchronous solid-state relay. The MCU causes the relay to close when the voltage delivered to the relay is at a zero crossing state. The MCU causes the relay to open at either (a) the moment when the voltage delivered to the relay is at a zero crossing state, or (b) the moment that the current delivered to the relay is both over a threshold level and at a zero crossing state.