Reliability-Based State Value Selection for Device Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing monitoring systems face difficulties in managing state quantity values for maintenance and monitoring due to overlapping values and challenges in appropriately specifying reliable values for device management.

Innovation Solution

An information processing device that acquires and processes state quantity values from multiple measurement instruments, using an extraction unit to group values by identical state quantities and a specification unit to select values based on reliability, ensuring accurate management even with overlapping data.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple measurement instruments measure the same state quantity, then measurement coverage and redundancy are improved, but data management complexity and reliability assessment difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement reliabilityVSAvoiddata management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the management of multiple measurement values by introducing an extraction unit that separates and groups values belonging to the same state quantity. This segmentation allows the system to handle multiple measurements systematically by organizing them into structured groups, thereby reducing management complexity while maintaining reliability through comprehensive data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The specification unit acts as an intermediary between the multiple measurement values and the final state quantity determination. It introduces reliability as an intermediate assessment criterion, evaluating each measurement value's reliability and selecting the most appropriate one. This intermediary mechanism resolves the contradiction by providing a systematic way to handle redundancy without increasing management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If multiple values for identical state quantity are collected, then data completeness is improved, but difficulty in specifying reliable values increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoidvalue specification difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the specification unit continuously evaluates measurement values based on reliability criteria. The system feeds back reliability assessments to determine which values to adopt, creating a closed-loop process that systematically resolves the difficulty of specifying reliable values while maintaining data completeness through comprehensive collection and evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter used for value selection from simple temporal or arbitrary selection to reliability-based selection. By introducing reliability as the key parameter for specifying which value to adopt, the system transforms the value specification process from a difficult subjective judgment to an objective parameter-driven decision, thereby reducing specification difficulty while maintaining data completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Quantity of substance

If all acquired values are used for management, then information completeness is improved, but processing load and analysis complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation quantityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The extraction unit extracts and identifies values belonging to the same state quantity from the acquired measurement data. This extraction process organizes the information by state quantity, allowing the system to maintain information completeness while reducing processing load by grouping related values together for systematic handling rather than processing them as individual isolated data points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of processing all acquired values equally, the patent applies partial action by selectively specifying only the necessary values for management based on reliability assessment. The specification unit determines which values within each group are most appropriate for management purposes, avoiding the excessive processing of all available data while maintaining sufficient information completeness for effective device management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11237547B2Information processing device, information processing method, and program
Publication Date: 2022.02.01 MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND LTD
  • US11237547B2 patent drawing
  • US11237547B2 patent drawing
  • US11237547B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an information processing device according to the present invention, an acquisition unit is configured to acquire a plurality of values related to a state quantity of a target device. An extraction unit is configured to extract a state value group constituted by a plurality of values related to an identical state quantity from the acquired plurality of values. A specification unit is configured to specify a value to be used to manage the target device from the state value group based on reliabilities of the values included in the state value group.