Automated Remittance Reconciliation via Format Conversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of reconciling electronic payments and handling exceptions in the process, such as errors in payment amounts or non-standard remittance data formats, poses a challenge in automating the matching of payments with outstanding receivables.

Innovation Solution

A payer profile and a matching engine are used to programmatically reconcile electronic receivables by matching payment data and remittance data, with customizable rules and a user interface for handling exceptions, allowing for manual corrections and format conversions to ensure accurate matching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated matching of electronic payments with outstanding receivables is implemented, then processing efficiency is improved, but complexity of handling exceptions and errors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity of handling exceptions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary system that includes a payer profile database and a matching engine. The matching engine acts as a mediator between incoming electronic payments and outstanding receivables, automatically matching payments to invoices using payer profiles stored in the database. This intermediary structure handles the complexity of reconciliation internally, allowing automated processing without requiring manual intervention for each transaction, thus resolving the contradiction between improved productivity and increased complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If manual correction and format conversion capabilities are added to handle non-standard remittance data, then reliability of matching is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of matchingVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by maintaining a payer profile database that stores standardized payment format information for different payers in advance. When a payment is received, the system queries this pre-established database to retrieve the appropriate format specifications. This preliminary preparation allows the system to automatically handle non-standard formats through format conversion based on pre-defined rules, improving matching reliability without adding complex real-time decision-making logic, thus resolving the contradiction between reliability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11720867B2Automated, history-based correction of electronic remittances for programmatic reconciliation of electronic receivables
Publication Date: 2023.08.08 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US11720867B2 patent drawing
  • US11720867B2 patent drawing
  • US11720867B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an embodiment, a computing system receives a first electronic remittance corresponding to a first electronic payment to a payee. The system determines that the first remittance is in a first, unrecognized format, and responsively presents, to the payee, a user interface for matching electronic remittances to electronic payments. The system receives, via the user interface, field-mapping information between the first format and a second, recognized format. The system receives a second electronic remittance corresponding to a second electronic payment directed to the payee, determines that the second remittance is in the first format, and responsively uses the field-mapping information to convert the second remittance to the second format. The system matches the converted remittance to the second payment, and provides, to the payee, a payment file that indicates a match between the second remittance and the second payment.