Remote Action Manager Communication Box Protocol Translation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for managing data from multi-vendor and multi-service IoT environments face challenges in integrating equipment from different suppliers, securing data access, and managing communication protocols, leading to limited adaptability and restricted data sharing, which hinders the development of comprehensive user services.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a remote action manager interacting with communication boxes through integrated access devices, using various communication mechanisms such as tunnel via proxy, Internet gateway device control protocol, extensible messaging and presence protocol, and simple traversal of user datagram through network address translation, to facilitate secure and centralized data management across diverse equipment protocols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If proprietary equipment from determined vendors is integrated into a platform, then integration with specific vendor equipment is achieved, but adaptability to integrate equipment from distinct suppliers is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintegration capabilityVSAvoidmulti-vendor adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

A communication box is introduced as an intermediary device between heterogeneous equipment from different vendors and the service platform. This communication box translates and adapts communication protocols, enabling the platform to interact with multiple vendor equipment through a unified interface without requiring the platform to support each vendor's proprietary protocol directly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system is segmented into distinct functional layers: the communication box handles protocol translation and vendor-specific interactions, while the service platform focuses on service logic and data processing. This segmentation allows each component to specialize, improving both integration ease and multi-vendor adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If multiple vendor services are executed in parallel on the same box, then service consolidation is achieved, but data sharing and service independence are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice execution efficiencyVSAvoidservice independence
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The communication box is divided into separate processing modules or virtual environments, each dedicated to executing services from different vendors. This segmentation ensures that services run in isolated contexts with dedicated memory and resource allocation, preventing interference between services while maintaining parallel execution capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Adaptability or versatility

If communication protocols change frequently with equipment changes, then support for new equipment is enabled, but box dependency on equipment protocols increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment compatibilityVSAvoidprotocol support complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The communication box acts as a protocol intermediary that maintains a library of supported communication protocols. When new equipment is introduced, the communication box handles protocol translation without requiring changes to the service platform, centralizing protocol management and reducing the platform's dependency on specific equipment protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Ease of manufacture

If users are compelled to use a communication box per vendor, then vendor-specific integration is ensured, but ergonomics in residence deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevendor integrationVSAvoiduser ergonomics
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple communication boxes from different vendors are merged into a single unified communication box that supports multiple vendor protocols simultaneously. This consolidation reduces the number of devices users need to manage while maintaining the integration capabilities required for vendor-specific equipment through protocol translation and multi-protocol support.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11329841B2Method of communication between a remote action manager and a communication box
Publication Date: 2022.05.10 BULL SA
  • US11329841B2 patent drawing
  • US11329841B2 patent drawing
  • US11329841B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of communication between a remote action manager and a communication box, for interacting with equipment connected to the communication box, by creating an association of a communication mechanism with the box, receiving an action request at the action manager destined for the equipment, identifying the communication mechanism associated with the box, and communicating the action request to the box via the identified communication mechanism.