Remote AI Model Certificate Validation for Offline Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

AI models deployed remotely face challenges in maintaining data validity due to disconnected training locations, leading to inaccurate inferences when training data becomes outdated, and lack of efficient update mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a security process that signs AI models with asymmetrical encryption, includes a timestamp, and uses a certificate authority to ensure validity and expiration, with an executor component to check certificates before execution, allowing for offline certificate renewal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If AI models are deployed remotely without connection to training location, then deployment flexibility and service continuity are improved, but data validity deteriorates due to outdated training data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment flexibilityVSAvoiddata validity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by signing the AI model with a certificate and timestamp before deployment. The executor component is pre-configured with the ability to verify certificate validity and automatically request renewals when expiration approaches, ensuring data validity is maintained without requiring constant connection to the training location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the executor component continuously monitors certificate validity status and automatically triggers renewal requests before expiration. This feedback loop ensures that the AI model remains valid and up-to-date even when deployed remotely without constant connection to the training location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If AI models are updated remotely, then service continuity is improved, but security control deteriorates due to lack of authorization verification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice continuityVSAvoidsecurity control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary authorization verification by signing the AI model with a certificate authority before deployment. The executor component is pre-configured with the public key to verify the signature, ensuring that only authorized models can execute. This preliminary security control maintains security while enabling remote updates and service continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If certificate validation is performed before execution, then security is improved, but system complexity increases due to additional verification steps

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The executor component performs self-service by automatically verifying its own certificate validity before execution and automatically requesting renewals when needed. This self-service approach maintains high security through continuous validation while minimizing system complexity by eliminating the need for external verification infrastructure at the deployment location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If AI models are retrained with new data, then data validity is improved, but deployment time increases due to model regeneration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata validityVSAvoiddeployment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by signing the AI model with a timestamped certificate that indicates its validity period. The executor component monitors this validity and proactively requests renewals before expiration, allowing the model to be retrained and redeployed without service interruption. This preliminary timing management reduces deployment time by avoiding last-minute model regeneration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260024012A1Security for remotely-deployed artificial intelligence (AI) models
Publication Date: 2026.01.22 HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEV LP
  • US20260024012A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024012A1 patent drawing
  • US20260024012A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for providing additional security for a remotely-deployed artificial intelligence (AI) model. For example, the method may comprise receiving a container with an AI model, a certificate, and an executor component, where training of the AI model occurs at a first location and the AI model is provided to a second location. The method may deploy the AI model at the second location and automatically determine, by the executor component, validity of the certificate associated with the AI model. Upon determining that the certificate is invalid, the method may automatically initiate an action on the AI model at the second location independent of the device at the first location.