Remote Application Migration After Crashes From Local Resource Limits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users of computationally intensive applications face crashes due to resource constraints in their computing devices, and existing checkpointing methods require explicit user intervention and result in wasted processing time if the application does not support checkpoint mechanisms.

Innovation Solution

Applications are migrated to a remote computer server that provisions necessary resources, allowing execution to resume and results to be seamlessly returned to the host device, identifying and allocating missing resources as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If application checkpointing is used to prevent crashes, then application reliability is improved, but user operation complexity increases due to explicit configuration requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication reliabilityVSAvoiduser operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects application crashes and performs checkpointing operations without requiring user intervention. The crash detection module monitors application states and triggers automated recovery procedures, allowing the system to serve itself rather than requiring explicit user configuration for reliability features.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-configures checkpoint criteria and recovery mechanisms before application execution begins. By establishing automated crash detection and recovery protocols in advance, the system eliminates the need for users to configure checkpointing parameters during operation, thereby improving both reliability and ease of use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If application checkpointing is implemented, then application reliability is improved, but processing time is lost due to stopping and copying data to storage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplication reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuous application execution by implementing background crash detection and automated recovery mechanisms. Instead of stopping the application to perform checkpointing operations, the system continuously monitors application health and performs recovery actions without interrupting the main processing flow, thereby preserving both reliability and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system rapidly detects crashes and executes recovery procedures in minimal time, effectively skipping the traditional lengthy checkpointing process. By implementing fast crash detection algorithms and streamlined recovery mechanisms, the system reduces the time penalty associated with reliability measures while maintaining application stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Ease of operation

If applications run on local computing devices, then ease of operation is maintained, but application productivity decreases due to resource constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidapplication productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables local computing devices to run resource-intensive applications by providing automated access to remote computing resources. The crash detection and recovery system acts as a universal interface that allows applications to leverage both local and remote resources transparently, thereby increasing productivity without compromising ease of operation for end users.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary crash detection and resource management layer between the application and computing resources. This intermediary automatically manages resource allocation and can transparently migrate application execution to remote servers when local resources are insufficient, thereby enhancing productivity while maintaining user-friendly operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12619460B2Remotely healing crashed processes
Publication Date: 2026.05.05 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12619460B2 patent drawing
  • US12619460B2 patent drawing
  • US12619460B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of repairing crashed applications includes detecting a crash in an application operating in a host computing device. The application is migrated to a remote computer server. The remote computer server provisions computing resources to the application, while the application is resident in the remote computer server. Resumed operation of the application is executed, using the provisioned computing resources, in the remote computer server. Execution results are generated from the application, in the remote computer server. The generated execution results are migrated from the application back to the host computing device.