Autonomous Driving Remote Assistance Withholding by Influence Area

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote monitoring technologies for autonomous driving vehicles often result in unnecessary requests for operator intervention and inappropriate remote instructions due to inconsistent criteria for determining similarity of point information, leading to inefficiencies and operator workload.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous driving system that registers point information including location and extent of influence, temporarily withholding remote assistance requests within defined influence areas, allowing vehicles to continue autonomous driving until reaching the original assistance point.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If remote assistance requests are generated based on inconsistent similarity criteria for point information, then operator intervention is triggered more frequently, but unnecessary operator requests and inappropriate remote instructions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of remote assistance requestVSAvoidoperator workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-registers point information including location data and extent of influence before remote assistance is needed. When the autonomous vehicle approaches a registered point, the system compares current sensor data with pre-registered information to determine if remote assistance is truly necessary, preventing unnecessary operator requests

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring the autonomous vehicle's location and comparing it with registered point information. The remote assistance device receives sensor data from the vehicle, determines similarity with pre-registered points, and only triggers operator intervention when genuine novel situations are detected, creating a closed-loop decision system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If remote assistance is provided frequently based on inconsistent criteria, then safety is maintained, but system efficiency decreases due to inappropriate remote instructions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of autonomous drivingVSAvoidsystem efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different evaluation criteria based on location-specific characteristics. Each registered point contains location-specific information and extent of influence, allowing the system to make context-appropriate decisions about whether remote assistance is needed, rather than applying uniform thresholds everywhere

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

By pre-registering point information with location data and extent of influence parameters, the system establishes a knowledge base that enables efficient real-time decisions. The vehicle and remote assistance device can quickly determine if assistance is needed by comparing current state with pre-established criteria, maintaining safety without excessive intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the system withholds remote assistance within defined influence areas, then unnecessary operator requests are reduced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem efficiencyVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system resolves complexity by performing the computationally intensive registration and analysis work in advance. Point information including location data and extent of influence is pre-calculated and stored, enabling simple real-time comparisons that withhold unnecessary remote assistance without requiring complex real-time processing

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The registered point information acts as an intermediary layer between the autonomous vehicle and the remote assistance operator. This intermediate data structure (containing location and extent of influence) mediates the decision-making process, filtering out situations that don't require operator intervention while maintaining system safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12570321B2Autonomous driving device, method and system
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 DENSO CORP
  • US12570321B2 patent drawing
  • US12570321B2 patent drawing
  • US12570321B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous driving method for causing a computer to perform a process of registering, for each point where remote assistance has been performed in the past for any one of autonomous driving vehicles, point information indicating a location of the point, and at least an extent of influence defined by a distance from the location of the point, and a process of, upon occurrence of a request for remote assistance from any one of the autonomous driving vehicles within the extent of influence included in the registered point information, temporarily withholding execution of remote assistance and causing the autonomous driving vehicle to perform autonomous driving.