Remote Atomic Operations for Cache Line Reconciliation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large-scale shared-memory systems face performance limitations due to the overhead of software-managed coherency, particularly in scenarios where data modifications across coherency islands can be viewed as reduction-type operations.

Innovation Solution

Implementing remote atomic operations near the memory endpoint to perform reduction-type operations within cache-line writebacks, thereby eliminating the need for write-ack visibility and inter-thread synchronization phases of software-managed coherency techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If software-managed coherency is used to maintain coherent data in globally shared structures, then data coherence is ensured, but performance overhead increases due to cache flushes, write-ack visibility, and inter-thread synchronization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata coherenceVSAvoidperformance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the shared-memory system into multiple coherency islands, where each island maintains local coherence independently. This segmentation allows parallel operations within islands without requiring global synchronization, reducing the performance overhead while maintaining reliability through localized coherence management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements hardware-based atomic operations that automatically handle the reconciliation of conflicting cacheline modifications without requiring software intervention. The atomic operation unit detects conflicts and resolves them through hardware mechanisms, eliminating the need for software-managed cache flushes and synchronization barriers, thus improving performance while ensuring data coherence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If structured programming approach is used to manage data flow across coherency islands, then correct data in global shared structures is achieved, but performance is limited due to software managed coherency overhead

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata correctnessVSAvoidperformance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces software-managed coherency mechanisms with hardware-based atomic operations. The atomic operation unit in hardware automatically detects and resolves cache line conflicts, substituting the mechanical software process of manual coherence management with an automated hardware mechanism, thereby improving performance while maintaining data correctness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The atomic operation unit acts as an intermediary between multiple coherency islands, automatically reconciling conflicting modifications to the same cacheline. This intermediary hardware component eliminates the need for software to manually coordinate data flow across islands, reducing overhead while ensuring correct data in global shared structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If remote atomic operations are used to perform reduction operations at memory endpoint, then performance overhead is reduced by eliminating write-ack visibility and synchronization phases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveperformanceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the atomic operation unit with the cache coherence management infrastructure, merging conflict detection and resolution functionality into the existing memory subsystem. This integration approach reduces system complexity by reusing existing hardware components rather than adding separate complex mechanisms, while still achieving performance improvements through automated atomic operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20250173149A1Apparatus and method for reconciling conflicting cacheline modifications
Publication Date: 2025.05.29 INTEL CORP
  • US20250173149A1 patent drawing
  • US20250173149A1 patent drawing
  • US20250173149A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus and method for reconciling cache line modifications. For example, one embodiment of a processor comprises: a plurality of instruction processing pipelines, each instruction processing pipeline to process sequences of instructions; an interconnect coupled to the plurality of instruction processing pipelines; and a memory subsystem coupled to plurality of instruction processing pipelines over the interconnect, the memory subsystem comprising a plurality of atomic operation circuits corresponding to a plurality of memory interfaces to be coupled to a corresponding plurality of memories, each atomic operation circuit configured to perform a corresponding reduction operation with first data stored in the memory and second data indicated in a command packet, the atomic operation circuit to generate result data based on the reduction operation which is to be stored in the memory.