Remote AV Assistance Operator Matching for Diverse Task Requests

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote assistance systems for autonomous vehicles are inefficient due to the varying characteristics of operators, leading to ineffective resource utilization and prolonged downtime when handling diverse requests from autonomous vehicles operating in different geographic areas with different types and capabilities.

Innovation Solution

A computing system tracks assisted autonomy tasks performed by operators, generates operator attributes, and matches these attributes with request parameters to select the most suitable operator for remote assistance, reducing computational resources and bandwidth by ensuring operator familiarity with the vehicle type, geographic area, and task requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If operators with varying characteristics are assigned to handle remote assistance requests, then the system can handle diverse requests from autonomous vehicles, but the effectiveness of remote assistance decreases due to mismatched operator expertise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle diverse requestsVSAvoideffectiveness of remote assistance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by tracking assisted autonomy tasks and generating operator attributes before requests occur. This allows the computing system to have operator profiles ready in advance, enabling quick and accurate matching when requests come in, thus resolving the contradiction between handling diverse requests and maintaining effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously tracking the performance and characteristics of operators through their handled tasks. This feedback loop allows the system to refine operator attributes and improve matching accuracy over time, ensuring that operator expertise aligns with request requirements while maintaining the ability to handle diverse situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If a plurality of operators are maintained to handle different types of requests, then the system can provide comprehensive coverage, but resource utilization becomes inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage of request typesVSAvoidresource utilization efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies dynamics by making operator assignments flexible and adaptive rather than static. Operators are dynamically matched to requests based on real-time analysis of their tracked attributes and the specific requirements of each request, allowing the system to maintain comprehensive coverage while optimizing resource utilization for each individual task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by using multiple attributes to describe operator capabilities and request requirements. By analyzing and matching these parameters (such as task types, geographic areas, vehicle types), the system can efficiently allocate operators to appropriate requests, improving productivity while maintaining the ability to handle diverse request types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If operator selection is based on comprehensive tracking of assisted autonomy tasks, then the matching accuracy improves, but the computational complexity and time required for selection increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperator matching accuracyVSAvoidcomputational system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most relevant attributes from the comprehensive tracking data of operator tasks. By identifying and focusing on key characteristics that are most predictive of successful operator-request matching, the system achieves high accuracy without requiring complex computational analysis of all possible task details, thus reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Reliability

If comprehensive tracking and attribute generation are performed for all operators, then the quality of operator selection improves, but the computational resources and bandwidth required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of operator selectionVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by generating and tracking attributes specifically for operators who are potential candidates for given request types. Rather than uniformly processing all operators for all requests, the system focuses computational resources on relevant operator-request pairs, maintaining high selection quality while reducing overall computational resource consumption and bandwidth usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20260037882A1Context-based remote autonomous vehicle assistance
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • US20260037882A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037882A1 patent drawing
  • US20260037882A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for controlling autonomous vehicles are provided. Assisted autonomy tasks facilitated by operators for a plurality of autonomous vehicles can be tracked in order to generate operator attributes for each of a plurality of operators. The attributes for an operator can be based on tracking one or more respective assisted autonomy tasks facilitated by the operator. The operator attributes can be used to facilitate enhanced remote operations for autonomous vehicles. For example, request parameters can be obtained in response to a request for remote assistance associated with an autonomous vehicle. An operator can be selected to assist with autonomy tasks for the autonomous vehicle based at least in part on the operator attributes for the operator and the request parameters associated with the request. Remote assistance for the first autonomous vehicle can be initiated, facilitated by the first operator in response to the request for remote assistance.