Remote Bidding Interface for Simultaneous Live Auctions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems do not allow a single remote bidder to efficiently participate in multiple simultaneous live auctions, making it difficult for companies and broker buyers to monitor and bid on multiple auctions simultaneously, especially across geographically dispersed locations, and lack a mechanism to track purchases and enforce bidding strategies effectively.

Innovation Solution

The system enables remote participation in multiple auctions by displaying multiple bidding screens with active and docked states, allowing high-quality audio and video feeds, and associating customer identifiers with bidding windows to automate bidding processes and track purchases, enabling a single bidder to monitor and participate in multiple auctions simultaneously.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a single remote bidder monitors multiple simultaneous auctions, then participation efficiency improves, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparticipation efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the auction monitoring interface into multiple separate bidding screens, each dedicated to a specific auction. Each screen displays auction-specific information including item details, current bids, and bidding controls. This segmentation allows the bidder to monitor multiple auctions simultaneously without information overload, improving participation efficiency while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The bidding device is designed with universal functionality to handle multiple simultaneous auctions through a single interface. The system provides standardized bidding controls and display formats that work across different auctions, allowing one bidder to efficiently participate in multiple auctions without requiring separate systems for each auction type or location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple representatives are sent to cover multiple auctions, then auction coverage improves, but overhead costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauction coverageVSAvoidoverhead costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates virtual copies of the bidding experience by providing remote access to multiple auction locations through electronic displays and communication systems. Instead of physically sending multiple representatives to different auction houses, a single bidder can access real-time video feeds, item images, and bidding interfaces for multiple auctions simultaneously, achieving comprehensive auction coverage while eliminating travel and personnel overhead costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If a single bidder runs between lanes to cover multiple auctions, then auction monitoring improves, but time loss increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauction monitoringVSAvoidtime loss
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary electronic communication system that connects the bidder to multiple auction lanes and locations. Through video feeds, electronic displays, and networked bidding interfaces, the bidder receives real-time information from multiple auctions without physical movement. This intermediary system eliminates the time loss associated with running between lanes while maintaining comprehensive auction monitoring capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Loss of energy

If remote bidding is implemented, then travel expenses are reduced, but participation disadvantage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel expensesVSAvoidparticipation disadvantage
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback mechanisms including live video feeds from auction floors, electronic display of current bids and item details, and immediate confirmation of bid submissions. This feedback loop ensures remote bidders receive the same information and experience the same level of engagement as on-site bidders, eliminating participation disadvantage while maintaining the cost benefits of remote bidding through eliminated travel expenses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS7664677B2Integration of remote bidders into multiple and simultaneous live auctions
Publication Date: 2010.02.16 MANHEIM
  • US7664677B2 patent drawing
  • US7664677B2 patent drawing
  • US7664677B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Multiple simultaneous auctions can be monitored and participated in using a single bidding device operated by a single remote bidder. A multi-windowed environment allows for the display of active bidding windows and docked bidding windows. The active bidding windows are fully functional bidding windows and include auction status, product information and the like. The docked bidding windows provide a subset of the information but, nonetheless provide real-time auction status information and allows for bidders to enter bids into the auctioning process without having to move the bidding window into an active status. A customer-identifier selector of identifier allows the remote bidder to associate a customer with a particular bidding window. The customer-identifier advantageously helps the remote bidder to track who purchased items are associated with, as well as providing control structure over the bidding process.