Remote Control Center for Autonomous Transit Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous navigation and driving technologies face challenges in public transit settings due to sensor malfunctions, inability to handle unforeseen situations, and lack of passenger assistance in autonomous vehicles, leading to safety concerns and operational inefficiencies.

Innovation Solution

A cost-efficient system allowing remote control of autonomous transit vehicles through advanced analytics software and simulator toolsets, enabling a small number of operators to manage multiple vehicles, with sensory inputs including cameras, microphones, and buttons for passenger assistance, and using fuzzy logic and machine learning to analyze data and intervene in emergency situations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If autonomous vehicles operate without drivers, then operational efficiency and cost are improved, but safety and reliability deteriorate due to sensor malfunctions and inability to handle unforeseen situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A remote control center serves as an intermediary between autonomous vehicles and human operators. The control center receives sensory input data from vehicles, analyzes situations using advanced analytics software, and provides remote control commands when autonomous systems encounter unforeseen situations or sensor malfunctions, thereby maintaining safety while preserving autonomous operation efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensory input from autonomous vehicles is transmitted to the control center, which monitors system performance and reliability metrics. When threshold risk levels are detected or unforeseen situations occur, the feedback mechanism triggers remote intervention, allowing the system to adapt and maintain safety while operating autonomously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If a full driver is removed from autonomous vehicles, then cost and efficiency are improved, but passenger assistance and security deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveefficiencyVSAvoidpassenger assistance
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The remote control center acts as a mediator providing passenger assistance services. Passengers can communicate with operators at the control center who can view vehicle surroundings through sensory inputs and provide guidance, assistance, or emergency intervention, maintaining ease of operation without requiring a physical driver in the vehicle

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical presence of a driver with a remote electronic communication system. Operators at the control center use audio communication devices and visual feeds from vehicle sensors to assist passengers, substituting the mechanical driver role with an electronic intermediary that maintains passenger assistance capabilities while improving efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If remote control centers monitor all vehicles continuously, then safety is improved, but device complexity and operational cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuously monitoring all vehicles with full remote control capabilities, the system implements partial monitoring where the control center receives and analyzes sensory input data selectively. Remote control is activated only when threshold risk levels are exceeded or unforeseen situations are detected, reducing system complexity while maintaining safety through targeted intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of sensory input data using advanced analytics software and machine learning algorithms before triggering remote control intervention. This preliminary action filters out routine situations and only activates the complex remote control system when genuinely unusual or risky situations are detected, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS9964948B2Remote control and concierge service for an autonomous transit vehicle fleet
Publication Date: 2018.05.08 FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
  • US9964948B2 patent drawing
  • US9964948B2 patent drawing
  • US9964948B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for assisting autonomous vehicles are provided. The methods and systems can help increase safety and consumer satisfaction with autonomous vehicles and help bridge the gap towards completely autonomy. A method for assisting autonomous vehicles can include providing an autonomous vehicle having sensory inputs and providing a remote control center having two-way communication with the autonomous vehicle. The autonomous vehicle can send its sensory input information to the control center and the control center can send control information to the autonomous vehicle.