Remote Control Device Discovery via Randomized Response Intervals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Universal remote controls face challenges in identifying controllable electronic devices due to collisions from simultaneous responses, as they can only process one response at a time, leading to ignored responses.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a collision avoidance mechanism that determines a random response interval for each electronic device to delay its response, preventing simultaneous receipt of multiple responses at the remote control, allowing for the processing of all responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If a polling mechanism is used to identify controllable electronic devices, then automatic configuration is enabled, but response collisions occur when multiple devices respond simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic configurationVSAvoidresponse processing reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by having electronic devices determine a random response interval before actually sending their response. This pre-planned delay ensures that responses are staggered in time, preventing collisions at the remote control receiver while maintaining the automatic configuration capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple electronic devices respond to a query simultaneously, then all devices can be identified, but the remote control can only process one response at a time causing other responses to be ignored

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-device controlVSAvoidignored responses
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by introducing time intervals between response transmissions. Each device waits for a randomly determined period before responding, creating a periodic rather than simultaneous transmission pattern. This ensures the remote control receives and processes all device responses without information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If a random response interval is implemented, then response collisions are reduced, but response time variability increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse collision avoidanceVSAvoidresponse time variability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by modifying the response time parameter to be random rather than fixed. This change in the time parameter distribution reduces collisions while accepting increased variability. The random interval is determined based on device characteristics, optimizing the balance between collision avoidance and response efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10057134B2Methods, systems, and products for discovering electronic devices
Publication Date: 2018.08.21 AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I L P
  • US10057134B2 patent drawing
  • US10057134B2 patent drawing
  • US10057134B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and products self-identify an electronic device to a remote control. The remote control queries the electronic device, and the electronic device sends a response. A collision avoidance mechanism allows difference devices to respond to the remote control.