Remote Control System for Unmanned Vehicles Using Segmented Communication Paths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in ensuring safety, particularly in stopping due to software malfunctions or loss of remote operator control, and interoperability issues arise from proprietary systems, making it difficult to design systems that work across various vehicle types and systems.

Innovation Solution

The Open Integration Platform (OIP) provides a control system that includes a Machine Integrated Control System (MICS) and Operator Control Unit (OCU), enabling safe and flexible integration of various machinery and vehicle types through a portable, API-based system, with built-in safety features and interoperability capabilities, such as emergency stop functions and multipath failsafes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple communication paths are used for control signals, then safety and reliability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into separate communication paths: a first communication path for control signals and a second communication path for status information. This segmentation allows independent operation of each path, improving reliability without requiring complete system redundancy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Status information acts as an intermediary that provides feedback about the health and state of the control system. This intermediary mechanism enables the system to monitor itself and detect failures without adding complex control logic to the primary control path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If proprietary systems are used for unmanned vehicles, then specific vehicle performance is optimized, but interoperability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle performanceVSAvoidinteroperability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The communication protocol is designed to be universal, enabling the same protocol to work across different vehicle types and manufacturers. This allows a single control system to interface with multiple proprietary vehicle systems without requiring vehicle-specific customizations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows for parameter configuration and adaptation of the communication protocol to accommodate different vehicle specifications while maintaining the same underlying protocol structure. This enables interoperability across diverse vehicle platforms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If single communication path is used for control, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability deteriorates due to software malfunctions or loss of control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidcontrol reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The communication system is segmented into separate paths for control signals and status information. This segmentation ensures that a failure in one path does not necessarily compromise the other, providing fault isolation without requiring a fully redundant dual-path control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The second communication path provides continuous feedback about the status of the control system, including health monitoring and diagnostic information. This feedback mechanism enables early detection of failures and maintains reliability without adding complex redundant control paths.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10025306B2System and method for remote control of unmanned vehicles
Publication Date: 2018.07.17 FORT ROBOTICS INC
  • US10025306B2 patent drawing
  • US10025306B2 patent drawing
  • US10025306B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A first device is provided. The first device includes a first processing unit, wherein the first processing unit is adapted to determine a first status of a first connection between the first processing unit of the first device and a corresponding first processing unit of a second device; and a second processing unit, wherein the second processing unit is adapted to determine a second status of a second connection between the second processing unit of the first device and a corresponding second processing unit of the second device. The first processing unit is further adapted to: receive the second status of the second connection from the second processing unit of the first device over a path between the first processing unit of the first device and the second processing unit of the first device; and determine one or more actions to take with respect to a machine associated with the first device based on one or both of the first status and the second status.