Remote Control Validation Logic for Secure Vehicle Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote control systems for vehicles lack the ability to validate and invalidate control operations securely, leading to potential improper implementations.

Innovation Solution

A remote control system with a command accepting unit and a controller that switches between valid and invalid states based on predetermined permission conditions, using communication units to verify and manage the switching process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If switching from invalidation to validation of remote control is unconditionally possible, then convenience for user is improved, but remote control may be implemented in improper situation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconvenience for userVSAvoidsafety of remote control operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary authentication checks (device authentication, person authentication, location authentication) before allowing validation of remote control. The command accepting unit checks whether the moving object is within a predetermined distance from the controller before switching from invalidation to validation state, preventing improper remote control activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to the user about the authentication status and remote control validity. The judging unit determines whether authentication is successful and controls the command accepting unit accordingly, creating a feedback loop that ensures only properly authenticated operations can validate remote control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If authentication checks are performed before validating remote control, then safety is improved, but operation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of remote control operationVSAvoidcomplexity of control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system is segmented into three independent modules: device authentication (checking if the controller is a predetermined device), person authentication (checking if the operator is a predetermined person), and location authentication (checking if the moving object is within predetermined distance). This segmentation makes the complex authentication process more manageable and maintainable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The command accepting unit serves multiple functions: it accepts remote control commands when in validation state, performs authentication checks, and switches between valid and invalid states. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12613530B2Remote control system, controller, and remote control method
Publication Date: 2026.04.28 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US12613530B2 patent drawing
  • US12613530B2 patent drawing
  • US12613530B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A remote control system includes a moving object including command accepting and first communication units. The command accepting unit is switchable between valid and invalid states. The valid state accepts a remote control command supplied from outside the moving object. The invalid state rejects the remote control command. The first communication unit transmits at least one information of first and second information. The first information indicates a sign that the operating state will switch to the valid state. The second information indicates that the operating state has switched to the valid state. A controller includes second communication and judging units. The second communication unit receives the at least one information. The judging unit permits switching of the operating state to the valid state when the judging unit judges that the second communication unit has received the at least one information and a predetermined permission condition is satisfied.