Remote-Controlled Service Cart for Shop Floor Logistics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current moveable service carts, tool boxes, and workstations are cumbersome and difficult to relocate in crowded shop environments, requiring manual pushing or pulling, which is inefficient and increases labor costs due to the need for multiple trips.

Innovation Solution

A remotely controllable service cart system equipped with a microcontroller, receiver, and drive system that responds to user commands, allowing the cart to move autonomously without manual intervention, using sensors and feedback mechanisms to navigate safely.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If the service cart is made large in stature to hold more tools and equipment, then the cart can carry more items, but it becomes difficult to move around in a crowded shop environment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool carrying capacityVSAvoidmanual maneuverability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical pushing/pulling system with an automated drive system comprising a motor, wheels, and remote control circuitry. This allows the cart to move autonomously or be controlled remotely, eliminating the need for physical manual manipulation while maintaining the ability to navigate the shop environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The cart is divided into functional segments: a stationary base unit containing the drive mechanism and a movable cart unit containing the tool storage. This segmentation allows the heavy-duty base to provide power while the cart portion can be easily positioned, resolving the contradiction between carrying capacity and maneuverability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If the technician manually pushes or pulls the service cart to relocate it, then the cart can be moved to different locations, but it requires significant physical effort and time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecart relocation capabilityVSAvoidtime to relocate cart
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical effort of pushing/pulling is replaced with an automated motor-driven wheel system controlled by a remote control device. The technician simply operates the remote control to move the cart to the desired location, dramatically reducing both physical effort and the time required for relocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The cart becomes self-propelled through the integrated motor and wheel system, eliminating the need for external manual force. The cart serves itself by moving under its own power when commanded by the remote control, thereby reducing the time and effort the technician must invest in cart relocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If the technician leaves the service cart stationary and makes multiple trips to retrieve tools, then the cart remains in place, but productivity decreases due to increased time to complete tasks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask completion efficiencyVSAvoidtime for multiple trips
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The technician's repeated manual trips to retrieve tools are replaced by the automated remote-controlled cart that can deliver tools directly to the work location. The remote control system enables the cart to autonomously transport tools, significantly reducing the time the technician spends making multiple trips and thereby improving overall task completion efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If the service cart is equipped with wheels for rolling movement, then the cart can be relocated more easily, but it still requires manual pushing or pulling which is difficult given the size and weight

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemobilityVSAvoidphysical strength required
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The manual force application through pushing/pulling is completely replaced by an electric motor system that provides the propulsive force. The motor, connected to the wheels through a transmission system, generates the necessary force to move the cart without requiring any physical strength from the technician, thereby maintaining mobility while eliminating the need for human muscular effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9643638B1Motorized service cart
Publication Date: 2017.05.09 BOSCH AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE SOLUTIONS INC
  • US9643638B1 patent drawing
  • US9643638B1 patent drawing
  • US9643638B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure describes a remotely controllable service cart system, and methods of operating the same. Such systems and methods may include a remotely controllable service cart, a microcontroller located on the service cart, a transmitter configured to transmit a command from a user, a receiver located on the service cart for receiving the transmitted command, the microcontroller configured to produce a control signal from the transmitted command, and a drive system located on the service cart and operatively connected to the microcontroller, the drive system configured to move the service cart in response to the control signal.