Remote Cooking Appliance Control via Authenticated Server Mediation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for remote control of cooking appliances lack a centralized intermediary server for secure and unified control, limiting multi-appliance management and user access.

Innovation Solution

A system with a central intermediate server that processes and transmits control instructions through a bidirectional communications network, integrating local control means in cooking appliances and user computing devices, ensuring secure operation by verifying user and appliance identities, and managing multiple appliances and users.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If direct connection between cooking appliance and remote control device is established, then communication speed is improved, but security and centralized control are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication speedVSAvoidsecurity and centralized control
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a server as an intermediary component that mediates all communications between remote control devices and cooking appliances. The server receives control instructions from remote devices, processes them through authentication and validation, then transmits approved instructions to the target appliances. This intermediary architecture maintains centralized control and security while enabling remote operation, resolving the contradiction between direct communication speed and secure centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple appliances are controlled directly by remote devices, then device versatility is improved, but system complexity and authentication management are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemulti-appliance control capabilityVSAvoidauthentication and authorization management
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges authentication, authorization, and appliance management functions into a single centralized server. Instead of implementing these functions in each appliance or remote device, the server consolidates user credential verification, appliance registration, permission management, and instruction routing. This consolidation enables versatile multi-appliance control while simplifying the overall system architecture and reducing the complexity of authentication management across multiple devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If centralized server processing is implemented, then security and control management are improved, but communication latency and response time are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity and control managementVSAvoidcommunication latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-registering appliances with the server and establishing authentication credentials before actual cooking operations. User profiles, appliance permissions, and communication channels are set up in advance. When cooking operations need to be controlled remotely, the pre-established connections and credentials enable rapid instruction transmission without real-time authentication delays, thus maintaining security while reducing operational latency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2822226B1System and method for food preparation and processing by cooking and computer program implementing the method
Publication Date: 2016.04.27 COMPANIA ESPANOLA DE ELECTROMENAJE
  • EP2822226B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2822226B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2822226B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The system includes at least one cooking appliance controlled from remote control means through a bidirectional communications network comprising an intermediate server with the capacity to process and transmit at least control instructions from said remote control means to a microprocessor of local control means, or vice versa. The proposed method is adapted to be carried out using the system proposed by the invention. The computer programme embodies one part of the proposed method.