Asynchronous Remote Copy Delay Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing asynchronous remote copy systems cannot determine the intrinsic cause of delay deterioration, which hinders precise measures to enhance remote copy reliability.

Innovation Solution

A management system that displays delay duration and average-of-writing-quantity graphs, allowing administrators to infer the intrinsic cause of delay deterioration by comparing these graphs, thereby identifying whether the cause is an increase in throughput or a change in processing mode.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If asynchronous remote copy is implemented to copy data from primary volume to secondary volume, then data redundancy and reliability are improved, but delay duration between primary and secondary storage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote copy reliabilityVSAvoiddelay duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating and storing the average writing quantity for each primary volume before delay deterioration analysis. This pre-computed information is then readily available when delay deterioration occurs, enabling rapid cause identification without adding real-time processing overhead to the remote copy operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If monitoring of delay duration is implemented, then remote copy reliability management is improved, but the ability to identify intrinsic cause of delay deterioration is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelay monitoring capabilityVSAvoidintrinsic cause information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary element - the average writing quantity metric - that mediates between the raw delay duration measurement and the intrinsic cause identification. By comparing delay duration trends with average writing quantity trends, the system can infer whether throughput increase or processing mode change caused the delay, thus recovering the lost intrinsic cause information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback by using the comparison result between delay duration graph and average writing quantity graph to provide diagnostic information about the intrinsic cause. This feedback loop allows administrators to understand not just that delay occurred, but why it occurred, enabling targeted corrective actions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If detailed monitoring information is collected to identify intrinsic cause, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelay cause identification precisionVSAvoidmanagement system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential information needed for cause identification - the average writing quantity per primary volume - from the complex remote copy system operations. By focusing on this single key metric rather than monitoring all possible parameters, the system achieves precise cause identification while keeping the management system relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9513839B2Management system and management method for computer system comprising remote copy system for performing asynchronous remote copy
Publication Date: 2016.12.06 HITACHI VANTARA LTD
  • US9513839B2 patent drawing
  • US9513839B2 patent drawing
  • US9513839B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A management system comprises management information. The management information includes a plurality of delay durations that respectively correspond to a plurality of times, and a plurality of metric values that respectively correspond to the plurality of times for a primary volume. The management system, based on the management information, displays a delay duration graph (521) representing a fluctuation in delay duration associated with the passage of time and an average-of-writing-quantity graph (524) representing a fluctuation in average of writing quantity associated with the passage of time, in a mode that enables comparison between the two graphs. The average of writing quantity is an amount of data written to the primary volume per write request.