Remote Copy Path Allocation Based on Network Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote copy techniques face challenges in setting an adequate number of paths between storage systems, leading to insufficient communication capacity and potential failures in data transfer.

Innovation Solution

A management apparatus calculates the necessary number of paths based on network quality and performance requirements, ensuring sufficient communication capacity for remote copy operations and enabling failover in case of controller failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the number of paths is increased to meet performance requirements, then communication capacity for remote copy is improved, but system complexity and configuration difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication capacityVSAvoidpath configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the number of active paths based on performance requirements and network quality metrics. The management apparatus calculates the necessary number of paths by comparing required communication capacity with actual network performance, adjusting path configuration parameters to match demand without manual intervention for each change

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The path configuration transitions from static to dynamic, where the management apparatus continuously monitors network quality and performance requirements, automatically adjusting the number of active paths in response to changing conditions. This enables the system to adapt path capacity dynamically rather than requiring fixed manual configuration

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the number of paths is increased to ensure sufficient communication capacity, then remote copy reliability is improved, but path management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote copy reliabilityVSAvoidpath management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The management apparatus performs self-service by automatically calculating and adjusting the number of necessary paths based on monitored performance data. Instead of requiring manual path management, the system autonomously determines optimal path configuration by comparing communication requirements with actual network capacity, maintaining reliability through automated adaptation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback control by continuously monitoring network quality and remote copy performance, then using this information to adjust path configuration. The management apparatus receives performance feedback, calculates whether current paths are sufficient, and automatically modifies path settings to maintain reliable operation without manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If path configuration is made flexible to adapt to different performance requirements, then system adaptability is improved, but configuration difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance adaptabilityVSAvoidconfiguration ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides self-service configuration by automatically determining the appropriate number of paths based on monitored performance requirements and network conditions. Users do not need to manually configure paths for different performance scenarios; the management apparatus autonomously adapts the configuration by calculating necessary path counts from performance metrics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system achieves adaptability through automatic parameter changes, where the management apparatus adjusts path configuration parameters based on performance requirements and network quality. This eliminates the need for manual reconfiguration when performance needs change, as the system automatically modifies parameters to match new requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20260017158A1Management apparatus, path setting method, and path setting program
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 HITACHI VANTARA LTD
  • US20260017158A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017158A1 patent drawing
  • US20260017158A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In a management node that manages a path between a primary storage system and a secondary storage system in a computer system, the secondary storage system includes a first node having a first SCS that processes copying in a unit of copy and a second node having a second SCS that performs a copy process in place of the first SCS when a failure occurs in the first SCS, the management node includes a processor, and the processor calculates a necessary number of paths, which is the number of paths necessary for a performance requirement, on the basis of quality of a network between the primary storage system and the secondary storage system and the performance requirement related to a communication amount necessary for copying in a unit of copy, and sets the necessary number or more of paths between the primary storage system and the first node.