Remote Device Control With Trial-Based Execution Mode Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users face difficulties in inputting execution environment parameters for controlling devices remotely due to lack of familiarity with the control programs, leading to inefficient execution modes.

Innovation Solution

A device control system with a management apparatus capable of executing programs in multiple modes, determining an appropriate execution mode based on trial results, and registering the determined mode for future use.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the user inputs a control program without execution environment parameters, then the ease of operation is improved, but the program execution performance deteriorates due to incorrect or missing parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of program inputVSAvoidprogram execution performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The management apparatus executes the control program in a first execution mode as a preliminary action before final execution. This trial execution allows the system to evaluate the program's performance and determine an appropriate execution mode in advance, ensuring optimal execution without requiring the user to manually specify execution environment parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The management apparatus automatically determines the execution mode by monitoring the program's execution results during the trial execution. The system serves itself by selecting the appropriate execution mode based on observed performance characteristics, eliminating the need for user intervention in specifying execution parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If the management apparatus executes the program in a first execution mode without determining the optimal mode, then the device complexity is reduced, but the execution time increases due to suboptimal performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexecution mode determination complexityVSAvoidprogram execution time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The management apparatus performs a preliminary execution of the program in a first execution mode to gather performance data. This preliminary action enables the system to later determine the optimal execution mode based on actual program behavior, avoiding the need for complex real-time analysis during final execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The management apparatus monitors the execution results of the program during trial execution and uses this feedback to determine the appropriate execution mode. The feedback mechanism allows the system to adapt the execution mode selection based on observed performance characteristics, optimizing execution time without requiring overly complex determination logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If the system provides detailed execution mode information to the user, then the ease of operation is improved, but the loss of information increases due to user confusion about execution parameters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser decision makingVSAvoidexecution parameter information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The management apparatus extracts the execution mode determination function from the user's manual configuration task. By automatically analyzing program execution results and determining the optimal execution mode, the system removes the burden of execution parameter information from the user, presenting only necessary information such as execution time and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms the execution mode selection from a user-facing parameter configuration task into an automated process. The management apparatus changes the parameters internally to select optimal execution modes based on program performance, while presenting simplified information to the user about execution time and cost without exposing complex execution parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12353310B2Device control system and method for controlling device
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 DAIKIN INDUSTRIES LTD
  • US12353310B2 patent drawing
  • US12353310B2 patent drawing
  • US12353310B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device control system remotely controls one or more devices. The device control system includes the one or more devices, and a management apparatus connected to the one or more devices via a network. The management apparatus is capable of executing, in a plurality of execution modes having different processing performances, a program in order to control the one or more devices. The management apparatus accepts input of the program, executes the accepted program in a first execution mode, which is one of the plurality of execution modes, and determines, based on an execution result, an execution mode in which the program is to be executed.