Remote Diagnostic System Using Device Data Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional diagnostic systems for multi-function devices (MFDs) face challenges in efficiently diagnosing and repairing complex issues due to noisy and uncertain device data, leading to time-consuming and costly customer support processes.

Innovation Solution

A remote diagnostic system utilizing a device data classification algorithm that constructs a conditional probability lookup table and score function to map fault codes to service call categories, coupled with a rules engine to analyze diagnostic data and automatically dispatch solutions to customers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional diagnostic systems use device data (fault codes, status codes, usage counters, sensor readings) to remotely diagnose problems, then remote diagnosis capability is provided, but the device data is noisy and uncertain leading to poor classification accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice data classification accuracyVSAvoiddiagnosis reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of device data into problem types before actual diagnosis. By pre-processing and categorizing the noisy device data into distinct problem types using classification algorithms, the system prepares structured information that improves subsequent diagnosis reliability and reduces the impact of data noise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary classification layer between raw device data and final diagnosis. This intermediary problem type classification acts as a mediator that transforms noisy, uncertain device data into structured problem categories, which then feed into the diagnosis system, thereby improving both measurement precision and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If conventional systems provide single response to customer calls after analyzing device data, then remote support is provided, but the process is time-consuming and costly for both customer and enterprise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupport process efficiencyVSAvoidcustomer support time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of device data into problem types before generating responses. This pre-processing step automatically categorizes issues and prepares structured diagnostic information, enabling faster response generation and reducing the time required for customer support interactions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically classifying device data and generating appropriate responses without requiring extensive manual analysis. The automated classification and response generation capabilities allow the system to serve customers independently, reducing support time and costs for both customers and enterprises.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If help-desk calls are used for problem diagnosis, then customer support is provided, but much time is spent gathering preliminary information before addressing the essence of the problem

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproblem diagnosis easeVSAvoidtime for gathering preliminary information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of device data automatically before the customer even contacts support. By pre-categorizing problems and preparing diagnostic information in advance, the system eliminates the need for time-consuming preliminary information gathering during actual support calls, making problem diagnosis easier and faster.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Extent of automation

If device data is transmitted to remote server for analysis, then remote diagnosis is enabled, but the classification of device data with respect to service action succeeds with only a small fraction of calls

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote diagnosis automationVSAvoiddevice data classification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification into problem types as a first step in automation. By pre-categorizing device data into distinct problem types using classification algorithms, the system establishes a foundation that improves the accuracy of subsequent service action classification, thereby increasing the fraction of calls where automated classification succeeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8312324B2Remote diagnostic system and method based on device data classification
Publication Date: 2012.11.13 XEROX CORP
  • US8312324B2 patent drawing
  • US8312324B2 patent drawing
  • US8312324B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A remote diagnostic system and method based on device data classification. Device diagnostic data with respect to a device can be acquired and a conditional probability look up table can be constructed for each fault code associated with the device diagnostic data by a classification module. A score function can then be created by summing the conditional probabilities and an occurrence of the fault code can be mapped to a service call category with a numerically highest score function. The fault occurrence data in association with a number of time stamps and device identifiers can be stored in a data warehouse. The occurrence of fault code can be matched with respect to a solution set which can be automatically dispatched to a customer via a communications link.