Remote Vehicle Monitoring and Driving With Adaptive Communication Modes
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing remote monitoring and driving technologies face challenges in efficiently utilizing bandwidth while maintaining low communication delays, with remote monitoring causing bandwidth congestion and remote driving requiring low latency.
Innovation Solution
A system and method that selectively employs peer-to-peer communication for remote driving and server-client communication for remote monitoring, ensuring efficient bandwidth use and low delay by adapting communication modes based on the specific requirements of each operation.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Loss of energy
If server-client communication is used for remote monitoring to allow multiple monitors to watch multiple vehicles, then bandwidth utilization is improved, but communication delay increases
Solution Approach 1:
The communication system is segmented into two distinct modes: server-client communication for remote monitoring and peer-to-peer communication for remote driving. This segmentation allows each communication mode to be optimized independently for its specific function, resolving the contradiction between bandwidth efficiency and low latency requirements
Solution Approach 2:
The system dynamically switches between server-client mode and peer-to-peer mode based on the operational requirements. When remote monitoring is needed, server-client communication is used for efficient bandwidth utilization; when remote driving is needed, peer-to-peer communication is activated for low-latency control signals
2Loss of time
If peer-to-peer communication is used for remote driving to reduce communication delay, then response time is improved, but bandwidth consumption increases
Solution Approach 1:
The communication system is segmented into two distinct modes: server-client communication for remote monitoring and peer-to-peer communication for remote driving. This segmentation allows each communication mode to be optimized independently for its specific function, resolving the contradiction between bandwidth efficiency and low latency requirements
Solution Approach 2:
The system dynamically switches between server-client mode and peer-to-peer mode based on the operational requirements. When remote monitoring is needed, server-client communication is used for efficient bandwidth utilization; when remote driving is needed, peer-to-peer communication is activated for low-latency control signals
3Measurement precision
If one remote driver is assigned to one vehicle for remote driving, then control precision is improved, but personnel cost increases
Solution Approach 1:
The remote driver is designed to perform multiple functions: they can conduct remote driving with full control authority or switch to remote monitoring mode where they can observe multiple vehicles simultaneously. This multi-functionality allows the system to maintain high control precision when needed while reducing personnel costs during normal monitoring operations
Solution Approach 2:
The system dynamically switches between server-client mode and peer-to-peer mode based on the operational requirements. When remote monitoring is needed, server-client communication is used for efficient bandwidth utilization; when remote driving is needed, peer-to-peer communication is activated for low-latency control signals
Data Source
AI summary
Remote monitoring and remote driving are selectively provided for a plurality of vehicles including a first vehicle. In remote monitoring for a plurality of vehicles, a server distributes monitoring information received from each of a plurality of vehicles to a plurality of remote cockpits including a remote cockpit. In remote driving for the first vehicle, the server establishes a one-to-one communication between the vehicle and the remote cockpit.


