Remote ECU Test Package Validation for Vehicle Embedded Software

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing software testing for vehicle-related features is cumbersome, time-consuming, and prone to inaccuracies due to the need for physical visits to testing facilities, limited test components, and inefficient manual management of end-to-end processes, which can lead to delays and human errors.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for managing tests that allows users to define test requirements remotely, automatically generating and validating test packages and environment configuration files, executing tests based on user inputs, and presenting results, thereby reducing geographical restrictions and improving efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If users physically visit testing facilities to configure and execute tests, then tests can be performed with available test components, but the process becomes time-consuming and geographically restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest execution accuracyVSAvoidtest configuration and execution time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies of test environments and test components that can be accessed remotely over a network. Users can configure and execute tests on virtual test benches without physically visiting the facility, thereby reducing time loss while maintaining test reliability through accurate virtual representations of the physical test environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a network communication system as an intermediary between users and test facilities. This intermediary enables remote access to test components and environments, eliminating the need for physical presence while ensuring reliable test execution through standardized communication protocols and interface abstractions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If generic test components are provided at testing facilities, then the facility can serve multiple users, but the test components cannot fulfill complex or new test requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest component flexibilityVSAvoidtest package complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic test environment configuration where test packages and test bench settings can be adjusted and customized based on specific test requirements. Users can modify test parameters, select different test components, and adapt the test environment dynamically without requiring physical reconfiguration, thereby enhancing versatility while managing complexity through software-based control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent divides the test system into modular, independently configurable components that can be selectively assembled into different test packages. This segmentation allows users to combine specific test components and configurations to meet complex or new test requirements while maintaining overall system manageability through standardized interfaces and modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Ease of operation

If test configuration is performed manually by users, then users can customize tests, but errors are easily introduced and corrections are difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest configuration easeVSAvoidtest configuration accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements automated validation mechanisms that provide immediate feedback on test configuration errors. The system checks configuration files, validates test package parameters, and notifies users of any issues before test execution, thereby maintaining ease of manual configuration while significantly improving configuration accuracy through automated error detection and correction guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Productivity

If end-to-end test processes are managed manually by different users on different systems, then each user can control their portion, but the process becomes inefficient and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest management efficiencyVSAvoidtest management system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple manual test management processes into a single integrated automated system that handles the entire end-to-end test workflow. The system consolidates test package generation, environment configuration, test execution, and result collection into one unified process, thereby improving productivity by eliminating manual handoffs and reducing errors, while managing complexity through centralized automated control and standardized interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12596640B2System and method for managing a test for testing an embedded system of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2026.04.07 WOVEN BY TOYOTA INC
  • US12596640B2 patent drawing
  • US12596640B2 patent drawing
  • US12596640B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a system, method, and device for managing a test for testing software of an embedded system. According to embodiments, the method may be implemented by at least one processor and may include: receiving, from a user, at least one first user input associated with one or more test requirements; generating, based on the first user input, at least one test package; generating, based on the at least one test package, at least one test environment configuration file; validating the at least one test package and the at least one test environment configuration file; determining a change in the software; and based on determining the change in the software, executing the test according to the validated at least one test package and the validated at least one test environment configuration file, wherein the software of the embedded system may include an in-vehicle electronic control unit (ECU).