Remote Engagement System for Live Events

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Remote viewers of live events lack the ability to convey support or discontent to event participants in real-time, failing to engage with the live audience effectively.

Innovation Solution

A remote engagement system that includes output devices at live events and user input devices connected via a communications network, where signals from remote viewers control audio and visual outputs in real-time, amplifying responses based on the number of inputs received.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If remote viewers use traditional passive viewing methods, then they can watch live events without interference, but they cannot convey support or discontent to event participants in real-time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to convey support or discontentVSAvoidaudience feedback to participants
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements real-time feedback by capturing audience reactions through input devices (microphones, sensors) and transmitting processed audio-visual signals back to the live event venue. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables remote viewers to convey support or discontent to event participants instantaneously, resolving the information loss between distant audiences and on-site participants.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary device that receives signals from remote input devices, processes them in real-time, and transmits appropriate commands to output devices at the event venue. This intermediary system bridges the geographical gap between remote viewers and on-site participants, enabling effective communication without direct physical presence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If the system processes signals from multiple input devices in real-time, then remote engagement is achieved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-time signal processing capabilityVSAvoidcontroller and communication infrastructure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is designed as a multi-functional device that can simultaneously receive signals from multiple types of input devices (microphones, sensors, input devices), process various signal types (audio, visual, data), and communicate with different output devices. This universal design consolidates multiple functions into a single system, managing complexity through integration rather than proliferation of separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical signal routing and manual processing with electronic and software-based solutions. Digital signal processing, automated protocol handling, and software-controlled device management substitute for manual mechanical operations, reducing physical complexity while maintaining real-time processing capabilities across multiple input devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS10555047B2Remote engagement system
Publication Date: 2020.02.04 MURUGAN CHANDRASAGARAN
  • US10555047B2 patent drawing
  • US10555047B2 patent drawing
  • US10555047B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A remote engagement system for a live event includes at least one output device located at the live event for providing an audio and/or visual output to people at the live event. A controller receives signals transmitted from a plurality of user input devices and in response thereto and in real time or near real time, controls the at least one output device located at the live event to provide an audio and/or visual output to people at the live event.