Remote Fluid-Handling Control With Local Autonomy During Outages

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote monitoring and control systems for fluid-handling devices, such as SCADA systems, are prone to failures during network outages and require special-purpose software installations, making them inefficient and costly for geographically distributed facilities like oil wells and petroleum pumping stations.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a command-center server and site master-controllers that allow remote control of fluid-handling devices via a web interface, enabling commands to be executed even without continuous network access and without the need for special software on user devices, using a protocol translation mechanism to communicate with various fluid-handling devices.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If SCADA systems are used for remote monitoring and control of fluid-handling devices, then remote control capability is achieved, but the system fails when network connection is lost and requires special-purpose software installation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote control capabilityVSAvoidsystem operation during network outage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by establishing local control logic and buffering mechanisms at the remote site before network failures occur. The local controller is pre-configured to operate autonomously, and data is buffered locally to ensure continuous operation during network outages, eliminating the need for special software installations on remote devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of operation

If technicians manually travel to remote fluid-handling devices for adjustments and inspections, then direct control is achieved, but time and costs increase due to frequent travel requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirect device controlVSAvoidtechnician travel time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical travel of technicians with automated electronic control and monitoring systems. Remote users can control fluid-handling devices and receive alerts through standard web browsers, eliminating the need for physical travel to remote sites while maintaining direct control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If special-purpose software is installed on computing devices for remote control, then control functionality is achieved, but user burden increases due to configuration requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote control functionalityVSAvoidsoftware installation and configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves universality by implementing remote control functionality through standard web browsers that are already installed on most computing devices. This multi-functional approach allows the system to work across different operating systems and devices without requiring specialized software installations, thereby reducing user burden while maintaining control functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11175680B2Remote control of fluid-handling devices
Publication Date: 2021.11.16 SITEPRO INC
  • US11175680B2 patent drawing
  • US11175680B2 patent drawing
  • US11175680B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided is a process, including: receiving, via the network interface, from a remote user device, a command to change a state of the fluid-handling device to a target state; translating the received command into a translated command operative to cause a local controller of the fluid-handling device to drive the fluid-handling equipment to the target state, the local controller being responsive to the command and feedback from the fluid-handling device indicative of whether the fluid-handling device is in the target state; and sending the translated command to the local controller.