Remote Operation Force Feedback for Abnormality Notification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote operation systems for moving bodies, such as vehicles and robots, lack effective mechanisms to notify remote operators of abnormalities in real-time, potentially leading to safety issues.

Innovation Solution

A remote operation system that includes processors to determine abnormalities in communication, the moving body, and the remote operator terminal, and applies an increased operation reaction force to the remote operator when an abnormality occurs, effectively notifying them of the issue.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional abnormality notification methods (visual/audible alerts) are used in remote operation systems, then the system structure remains simple, but the notification effectiveness and remote operator awareness of abnormalities is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabnormality notification effectivenessVSAvoidsystem structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the abnormality notification system provides real-time force feedback to the remote operator through the operation member. When an abnormality is detected in the moving body or its surroundings, the notification unit generates a reaction force that is transmitted back to the remote operator, creating a closed-loop feedback system that enhances abnormality awareness without requiring complex additional interfaces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional visual or audible notification mechanisms with a mechanical force feedback system. Instead of relying on screens, speakers, or other complex notification devices, the system uses the existing mechanical connection between the operation member and the notification unit to transmit abnormality information through tactile force, substituting mechanical interaction for electronic notification channels

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If the operation reaction force is increased to notify the remote operator of an abnormality, then the notification becomes more noticeable, but the operation force required by the remote operator increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabnormality recognition clarityVSAvoidoperation force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The notification unit applies the reaction force in a periodic or pulsating manner rather than as a continuous force. This periodic action creates distinct tactile sensations that are easily recognizable by the remote operator, allowing clear abnormality notification while keeping the average operation force relatively low. The intermittent nature of the force application prevents excessive cumulative force requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The reaction force is applied locally and selectively to specific operational parameters rather than uniformly increasing force across all operations. The notification unit targets specific operation members or control inputs where abnormalities are detected, providing focused tactile feedback only when and where needed, thereby maintaining low operation force for normal operations while achieving high notification clarity for abnormal conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12276980B2Remote operation system and abnormality notification method
Publication Date: 2025.04.15 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US12276980B2 patent drawing
  • US12276980B2 patent drawing
  • US12276980B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A remote operation system includes a moving body is a target of a remote operation performed by a remote operator and a remote operator terminal on the remote operator side. The remote operation system determines whether at least one of an abnormality in a communication between the moving body and the remote operator terminal, an abnormality in the moving body, and an abnormality in the remote operator terminal occurs. The remote operation system sets a gain to be larger when the abnormality occurs than when no abnormality occurs. The remote operation system calculates a reaction force control amount by multiplying a base reaction force control amount by the gain. The remote operator terminal applies an operation reaction force according to the reaction force control amount to a remote operation member operated by the remote operator.