Remote Vehicle Guidance for Complex Maneuver Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in navigating complex or unexpected situations, such as construction zones, where they need to decide whether to move onto oncoming traffic lanes, requiring sophisticated verification processes that current systems may not adequately handle.

Innovation Solution

A remote guidance system for autonomous vehicles that includes sensors to detect trigger events, a transceiver to communicate with a server, and a controller to receive and verify driving instructions, allowing the vehicle to autonomously perform maneuvers based on prioritized trajectories provided by the server.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the autonomous vehicle controller processes complex sensor data independently, then the vehicle can maintain operational autonomy, but the system may fail to handle sophisticated verification requirements for complex maneuvers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling capabilityVSAvoidverification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a remote server as an intermediary between the autonomous vehicle controller and the complex verification requirements. The server receives sensor data from the vehicle, performs sophisticated verification for complex maneuvers (such as construction zone navigation), and returns verification results to the controller. This mediator approach enables the vehicle to handle complex situations that exceed the controller's independent processing capabilities while maintaining operational autonomy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the vehicle sends all sensor data to a remote server for verification, then sophisticated maneuvers can be verified, but communication latency may increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification accuracyVSAvoidcommunication time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial action by selectively transmitting only the necessary sensor data and maneuver verification requests to the remote server, rather than sending all sensor data continuously. The controller determines when verification is needed based on the complexity of the maneuver and sends targeted queries to the server. This approach achieves sophisticated verification while minimizing communication time and data transmission overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If the controller implements comprehensive verification protocols for all maneuvers, then safety is improved, but the system complexity and processing load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the verification system into two distinct parts: a local controller that handles routine maneuver verification and a remote server that handles complex maneuver verification. The controller includes a maneuver verification module for local checks and a server communication module for remote verification. This segmentation allows comprehensive safety verification to be achieved while distributing system complexity between the vehicle's onboard systems and the remote infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240069543A1Vehicle remote guidance system
Publication Date: 2024.02.29 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US20240069543A1 patent drawing
  • US20240069543A1 patent drawing
  • US20240069543A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle includes a sensor configured to provide sensor data indicative of an environment outside the vehicle; a transceiver configured to communicate with a server; and a controller configured to, responsive to the sensor data indicative of a predefined trigger event, send a request for remote guidance to the server, receive an instruction from the server indicative of a first trajectory having a first priority and a second trajectory having a second priority, and perform a driving maneuver to implement one of the first trajectory or the second trajectory.