Remote Identity Proofing Using Multi-Source Data Verification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current identity verification processes in healthcare and finance industries are cumbersome and time-consuming, often requiring in-person authentication, which can delay access to sensitive information and disrupt services, especially when passwords are forgotten or lost.

Innovation Solution

A remote identity proofing system that uses a combination of credit-based, clinical-based, and claims-based information, along with biometric and knowledge-based authentication, to verify identities and issue trusted identities, allowing secure access to protected information without the need for repeated authentication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If in-person authentication is used to verify identity, then security is improved, but service efficiency and accessibility deteriorate due to delays and disruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveidentity verification securityVSAvoidservice efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical in-person authentication system with an automated remote authentication system that uses electronic data processing, biometric verification, and knowledge-based authentication. This substitution eliminates the need for physical presence while maintaining security through multiple verification layers including credit-based, clinical-based, and claims-based information validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables applicants to complete identity verification independently through automated processes. The remote authentication system allows users to provide biometric data, answer knowledge-based questions, and receive verification results without human intervention, thereby improving service efficiency while maintaining security standards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If multiple verification methods are implemented, then security is enhanced, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication securityVSAvoidverification system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the authentication system into distinct modular components: biometric verification module, knowledge-based authentication module, credit-based verification module, clinical-based verification module, and claims-based verification module. Each module handles a specific aspect of verification, making the overall complex system manageable through functional segmentation and independent operation of each verification component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs a universal authentication framework that can accommodate multiple verification methods (biometric, knowledge-based, credit-based, clinical-based, claims-based) within a single integrated platform. This multi-functional approach allows the system to adapt different verification strategies based on the specific authentication scenario while maintaining a unified system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If remote authentication is implemented, then service accessibility is improved, but verification reliability may deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveservice accessibilityVSAvoididentity verification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary verification actions by collecting and validating multiple types of information (credit-based, clinical-based, claims-based) before completing the authentication process. This preliminary data gathering and validation ensures that remote authentication maintains high reliability by establishing multiple verification checkpoints before granting access.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication system incorporates feedback mechanisms where verification results from different modules (biometric, knowledge-based, credit-based, etc.) are continuously evaluated and cross-validated. This feedback loop ensures that remote authentication maintains accuracy by comparing results across multiple verification methods and adjusting the authentication decision based on cumulative evidence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10467468B2System and method for identity proofing and knowledge based authentication
Publication Date: 2019.11.05 MICHIGAN HEALTH INFORMATION NETWORK SHARED SERVICES
  • US10467468B2 patent drawing
  • US10467468B2 patent drawing
  • US10467468B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Illustrative methods, processes, and software remotely prove the identity of individuals fully compliant with identity proofing policies. The embodiments receive a request to verify an identity from an applicant device. The request includes an identification for an application to which access is desired. Then, the embodiments receive any combination of credit-based, clinical-based, and/or claims-based information corresponding to an applicant identified in the received request; send to the applicant device one or more queries related to the received combination according to one or more identity proofing requirements; receive, from the applicant device, one or more responses to the one or more queries where the one or more response comprise authentication information; determine a match between the authentication information and the received combination of any of credit-based, clinical-based, and claims-based information; and, based on the determination of the match, granting access to the desired application to the applicant device.