Remote Immobilizer Control Using Area Security Information

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote immobilizer systems fail to function appropriately in regions outside the registered area, leaving vehicles vulnerable to theft or unauthorized activation.

Innovation Solution

An information processing device that acquires security information from a predetermined area where the vehicle is parked and outputs commands to set or release the remote immobilizer based on the security state, enhancing protection even in unregistered areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the remote immobilizer is activated only in registered areas, then the system operation is simple, but the security coverage is insufficient in unregistered areas

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity coverageVSAvoidsystem operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The server device acquires security information from multiple sources including crime statistics databases and real-time incident data, enabling the system to function effectively both in registered and unregistered areas. The remote immobilizer function is extended beyond its original limited scope to provide universal security coverage across all geographic areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The server device acts as an intermediary between the vehicle terminal and the security information infrastructure. It collects, processes, and analyzes security information from various sources, then transmits appropriate immobilizer control commands to the vehicle terminal based on the analyzed security state, enabling intelligent decision-making without direct user intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If the remote immobilizer is activated based on comprehensive security information, then the security effectiveness is improved, but the information processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity effectivenessVSAvoidinformation processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The server device pre-acquires and stores security information for various geographic areas in advance, including crime statistics and security zone data. This preliminary preparation enables rapid decision-making when vehicles report their locations, as the security assessment can be performed by comparing current location against pre-loaded security information rather than gathering data in real-time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the vehicle terminal reports its location and the server responds with appropriate immobilizer control commands based on the security state. The system continuously monitors and adjusts immobilizer status according to changes in security conditions, creating a closed-loop control system that adapts to evolving threats.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250214531A1Information processing device
Publication Date: 2025.07.03 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US20250214531A1 patent drawing
  • US20250214531A1 patent drawing
  • US20250214531A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In response to the vehicle being parked, a control unit configured to perform acquiring information regarding security in a predetermined area including a position at which the vehicle is parked, and outputting information regarding a setting of a remote immobilizer of the vehicle in response to the security in the predetermined area being in a predetermined state.