Remote Interface Actuation for Secure Non-Networked Equipment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing production equipment units that are not networked pose challenges for remote operation due to the need for physical inputs and the security risks associated with network connectivity, which can lead to hacking and unauthorized access.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a chassis, actuators, and a selector that can be temporarily or permanently installed on non-networked production equipment units to translate virtual inputs from a remote operator into physical actions, while incorporating security measures to prevent unauthorized access.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If production equipment units are networked to enable remote operation, then remote accessibility is improved, but security risks increase due to potential hacking and unauthorized access

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote accessibilityVSAvoidsecurity risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a remote interface device as an intermediary between the remote operator and the production equipment. This device physically connects to the equipment's local interface, allowing remote operators to interact with equipment without direct network connectivity to the equipment itself, thus enabling remote operation while maintaining security isolation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the control architecture into distinct components: a remote interface device that interfaces with the equipment locally, and a remote computing device that operates independently. This segmentation allows the equipment to remain non-networked while still enabling remote operation through the localized interface device

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If production equipment units remain non-networked to maintain security, then security risks are reduced, but remote operation capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesecurityVSAvoidremote operation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The remote interface device serves as a mediator that bridges the gap between physical equipment and remote operators. It captures inputs from remote operators and translates them into physical actions at the equipment's interface, enabling remote operation without requiring the equipment itself to be networked

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a virtual representation of the equipment's interface at the remote location. The remote computing device displays a replica of the equipment interface, allowing operators to interact with a copy of the interface remotely while the actual physical interface remains localized and secure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of operation

If a remote interface device is installed on production equipment units to enable remote operation, then remote accessibility is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote accessibilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The remote interface device is designed to be universally compatible with multiple types of production equipment. It can interface with various equipment through standardized connections and supports multiple operators simultaneously, reducing the need for equipment-specific custom solutions and thereby managing complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If multiple remote operators access the same production equipment unit simultaneously, then productivity is improved through concurrent operation, but coordination complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconcurrent operationVSAvoidcoordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the control interface into multiple independent remote computing devices, each with its own display and input capabilities. This allows multiple operators to work simultaneously on the same equipment without sharing a single interface, reducing coordination complexity while maintaining productivity benefits

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12493276B2System for remote operation of non-networked production equipment units
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 APPRENTICE FS INC
  • US12493276B2 patent drawing
  • US12493276B2 patent drawing
  • US12493276B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One variation of a system includes: a chassis located over a physical user interface of a production equipment unit that includes a set of physical input fields; a set of actuators coupled to the chassis; a selector manipulated by the set of actuators and interfacing with the set of physical input fields; a communication module configured to receive a command—corresponding to a virtual input entered by a remote operator at a virtual user interface representing the physical user interface and depicted within an operator portal remote from the production equipment unit—during a procedure at the production equipment unit; and a controller configured to: drive the set of actuators according to the command to manipulate the selector across a physical input field on the physical user interface and thus physically reproduce the virtual input at the physical user interface of the production equipment unit.