Remote Intervention System Using Risk Models and Alerts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machine learning and alert provision technologies lack effective methods for remote intervention and personalized action recommendations based on user data analysis, particularly in identifying user categorization and response attributes for interventions.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that utilize a content management server to retrieve user data, input it into a risk model to generate a risk value, and use a classification algorithm to identify user categorization and determine response attributes, generating action recommendations and alerts for supervisors, including computer code to trigger I/O subsystems for actionable outputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If machine learning algorithms are used to analyze user data and generate personalized action recommendations, then the effectiveness of remote intervention is improved, but the system complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of remote interventionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex machine learning task into distinct components: a risk model that processes user data to generate risk values, and a separate classification algorithm that categorizes users and determines response attributes. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The content management server acts as an intermediary that retrieves user data from databases, processes it through the risk model and classification algorithm, and generates actionable recommendations. This intermediary layer abstracts the complexity of machine learning operations from both data sources and output interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If user data is retrieved and processed through risk models and classification algorithms to generate personalized recommendations, then the precision of intervention targeting is improved, but the processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprecision of intervention targetingVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing user data through the risk model to generate risk values and pre-categorizing users based on their attributes. These pre-computed values are stored and can be quickly retrieved when intervention decisions are needed, reducing real-time processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms raw user data into meaningful parameters such as risk values and categorization labels through the risk model and classification algorithm. These transformed parameters condense complex user profiles into actionable metrics that enable precise targeting without requiring exhaustive analysis during intervention deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system generates detailed action recommendations with response attributes for each user, then the personalization of intervention is improved, but the quantity of data processed and stored increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepersonalization of interventionVSAvoidquantity of data processed
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential attributes needed for personalization from complete user profiles, such as risk values and key categorization labels. By taking out only the critical data elements required for generating action recommendations, the system achieves personalization without processing or storing entire user datasets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of generating comprehensive intervention plans for all users and then filtering, the system inverts the approach by first identifying key user characteristics through categorization and risk assessment, then generating personalized recommendations only for those characteristics. This inversion reduces the overall data processing burden while maintaining personalization effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Data Source

PatentUS11238375B2Data-enabled success and progression system
Publication Date: 2022.02.01 PEARSON EDUCATION INC
  • US11238375B2 patent drawing
  • US11238375B2 patent drawing
  • US11238375B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and method for remote intervention are disclosed herein. The system can include a memory including: a user profile database; and a model database. The system can include a user device and a supervisor device, each of which including: a network interface; and an I/O subsystem. The system can include a content management server that can: receive data identifying a user of the user device; retrieve user data for the user from the user profile database; retrieve a risk model from the model database; generate a risk value based on the risk model; generate an action recommendation identifying an action for completion; and generate and send an alert to the supervisor device, which alert includes the action recommendation and includes computer code to trigger activation of the I/O subsystem of the supervisor device to provide the action recommendation.