Automotive Remote Key With Stowable Pivot Button

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote control devices for motor vehicles with retractable keys have insufficient flexural rigidity due to small indexing surface area and complex designs with many components, and the button rotates with the insert, causing friction issues during deployment.

Innovation Solution

A remote control device with a simplified design featuring a push-button that acts as the pivot pin, secured to the upper shell for rotation, and a helical spring for elastic return, providing better flexural rigidity and preventing button rotation, using radial tenons for indexing and a clevis for mechanical strength.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the button is secured in terms of rotation to the upper shell, then the flexural rigidity of the insert is improved, but the button cannot rotate with the insert during deployment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexural rigidity of insertVSAvoiddeployment smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The button is segmented into two functional parts: a rotational pivot function (allowing insert deployment) and a structural support function (maintaining flexural rigidity). The button is secured to the upper shell at a specific point to maintain rigidity while still allowing rotation around that secured point during insert deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The button's rotation axis is repositioned from a peripheral location to a central location on the button. This dimensional change in the rotation axis position allows the button to maintain structural integrity while enabling smooth rotational deployment of the insert.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If a complex design with multiple components (pivot pin, bell housing, button) is used, then the button can rotate with the insert, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebutton rotation during deploymentVSAvoidnumber of component parts
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The button is merged with the pivot pin function by securing the button directly to the upper shell to serve as the rotation pivot. This eliminates the separate bell housing and pivot pin components, reducing the total number of parts while maintaining the rotational deployment function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The button serves multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as the pivot point for insert rotation, provides structural support for the upper shell, and maintains flexural rigidity during deployment. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate dedicated pivot components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Device complexity

If the indexing surface area between bell housing and lower shell is small, then the device complexity is reduced, but the flexural rigidity of the insert deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindexing mechanism simplicityVSAvoidflexural rigidity of insert
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The indexing mechanism transitions from a surface-area-based contact (bell housing to lower shell) to a point-based rotational pivot (button secured to upper shell). This dimensional change concentrates the indexing function at a specific rotation point, providing sufficient mechanical strength without requiring large surface areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution enhances flexural rigidity and reduces component complexity, ensuring the insert maintains mechanical strength and stability without button rotation, allowing for efficient deployment and retraction with improved mechanical performance.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic return mechanism for returning the insert towards the deployed position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a helical spring working in torsion and in compression

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 3

the insert may be braked by the action or friction of the driver's digit on the button while he is pressing it to deploy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8770001B2Remote control device with stowable key, in particular for an automobile
Publication Date: 2014.07.08 VALEO SECURITE HABITACLE
  • US8770001B2 patent drawing
  • US8770001B2 patent drawing
  • US8770001B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a remote control device with a stowable key, in particular for an automobile, which comprises a remote control casing including two lower (1) and upper (2) shells, an insert (3) defining a key-bit pivotally mounted between an extended use position and a stowed position inside the casing, and an elastic return mechanism for returning the insert to the extended position, which comprises a push button (4) provided on the upper shell (2). According to the invention, the insert (3) rotates directly about said button (4) which is rotatingly connected with the upper shell (2), and includes rotational indexing means with said insert (3) that can be declutched by pushing said button (4).