Remote Control Location Detection Using Multi-Modal Sensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Remote controls are often lost or misplaced, and existing methods for locating them, such as sounding them, are ineffective in environments where sounds are not easily perceivable, making it difficult for users to find them.

Innovation Solution

Devices emit sounds, vibrations, or lights in response to commands, and the resulting sensing signatures are analyzed to determine their location using sensors and machine learning algorithms, allowing for precise location determination.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a remote control emits sound to indicate its location, then users can locate the remote control in open environments, but the method becomes ineffective when the remote control is in locations where sounds are not easily perceivable (e.g., under cushion)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation detection accuracyVSAvoidenvironmental adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the location detection function into multiple independent sensing modalities: sound emission, vibration sensing, and light sensing. Each modality operates independently to detect different environmental characteristics, allowing the system to adapt to various locations by selecting or combining appropriate sensing methods based on the detected environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The remote control device is equipped with multiple sensors (microphone, accelerometer, light sensor) that enable it to perform multiple sensing functions. This multi-functionality allows the device to operate effectively across diverse environments by using the most appropriate sensing modality for each specific location scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If multiple sensing functions are added to determine device location, then location accuracy in various environments improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation determination accuracyVSAvoidsensing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from multiple sensors to continuously monitor the device's environment. Based on this feedback, the machine learning model dynamically determines the most appropriate sensing modality or combination of modalities to use, optimizing location detection accuracy while avoiding unnecessary activation of all sensors in every situation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the operational parameters of the sensing system by using a machine learning model to dynamically select which sensors to activate and how to interpret their readings. This parameter-based approach allows the system to adapt its complexity level based on the specific detection scenario, using only the necessary sensing capabilities for each situation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the remote control emits light or vibration to indicate location, then location can be determined in sound-insensitive environments, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocation detection capabilityVSAvoiddevice energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic sensing and emission actions rather than continuous operation. The machine learning model determines when to activate each sensing modality based on the detected environment, allowing the device to remain in a low-power state until location detection is needed, and even then, only activating the necessary sensors for the specific situation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by activating only the necessary sensing modalities required for the current detection scenario. Instead of continuously using all sensors, the system selectively activates sound, vibration, or light emission based on what is needed for the specific environment, thereby reducing overall energy consumption while maintaining detection effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate identification of a remote control's location, even in challenging environments, by analyzing feedback from emitted sounds, vibrations, or light patterns, facilitating easy retrieval.

Implementation Method 1

The generated sensing signature may be indicative of a reflection of sound and/or light from the device's surrounding environment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSound reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 2

The generated sensing signature may be indicative of a reflection of sound and/or light from the device's surrounding environment

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 3

a vibration sensing signature may indicate a level of vibration feedback measured by an accelerometer

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Data Source

PatentUS20260039894A1Systems, methods, and apparatuses for device location
Publication Date: 2026.02.05 COMCAST CABLE COMM LLC
  • US20260039894A1 patent drawing
  • US20260039894A1 patent drawing
  • US20260039894A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatuses for device location are described herein. Location information of a lost control device may be determined based on sensing signatures according to various modalities. The sensing signatures may be based on responses to activated functions of the lost remote control. The location information may be determined based on an instruction received while the lost remote control is in an active state. Frequently lost remote controls may be in the active state more frequently. An alternative remote control may be selected as a substitute for the lost remote control before the lost remote control is found. The alternative remote control may be configured to control a device previously controlled by the lost remote control.