Remote Lock Bolt Mechanism for Parcel Locker Key Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing lock systems for lockable volumes, such as parcel lockers, often require individual physical keys, leading to management challenges and potential damage, and lack remote operation capabilities, making them inconvenient for secure and accessible access.

Innovation Solution

A remotely operable lock system with a bolt movable between locked and unlocked positions, actuated by a slider and pin mechanism, controlled via a central unit, allowing electronic access without external key components, and incorporating a spring for secure locking and unlocking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If physical keys are used for locking, then the lock can be operated locally, but key management becomes complex and keys may be damaged or lost

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveLocal operation capabilityVSAvoidKey management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional mechanical key-based locking system with an electronic locking mechanism. The lock includes an actuator (such as a solenoid or motor) that can be controlled remotely via electronic signals, eliminating the need for physical keys. This substitution resolves the contradiction by maintaining local operation capability through electronic actuation while removing key management complexity and associated risks of key loss or damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a digital copy of the key in the form of an electronic code or signal that can be transmitted remotely. Instead of physical keys that can be copied and lost, the system uses digital credentials that can be easily managed, revoked, or updated without physical duplication risks. This allows multiple users to access the lock through electronic means without the physical key management issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Device complexity

If physical keys are used for locking, then the lock structure can be simple, but remote operation capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveLock structure simplicityVSAvoidRemote operation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent designs the locking mechanism to serve multiple functions: it can be operated locally through electronic controls and remotely through communication networks. The actuator system integrates both local and remote operation capabilities, allowing the same locking mechanism to respond to different types of control signals. This multi-functionality enables the lock to maintain structural simplicity while achieving remote operation capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an electronic intermediary system (such as a controller, sensor, or communication module) that bridges the gap between remote operation and the mechanical locking action. This intermediary receives remote signals and translates them into actuator commands, enabling remote operation without requiring the remote user to directly interact with the mechanical lock structure. The intermediary layer allows simple lock anatomy while achieving complex operation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If a bolt mechanism is used for locking, then secure locking can be achieved, but the lock requires precise mechanical alignment and maintenance

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSecure locking capabilityVSAvoidMechanical alignment maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical key-based locking with an electronically controlled actuator system. The actuator (such as a solenoid or motor-driven mechanism) provides secure locking through electronic control rather than mechanical precision. This substitution reduces the need for precise mechanical alignment and maintenance, as the electronic system can compensate for variations in mechanical positioning and the actuator can be easily replaced without requiring specialized alignment procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables secure, remote operation of lockable volumes, reducing reliance on physical keys, enhancing accessibility, and preventing unauthorized access while maintaining secure locking mechanisms.

Implementation Method 1

a spring disposed around an end of the bolt and in contact with the pin. The spring is biased to urge the bolt into the first locked position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11842589B2Lock
Publication Date: 2023.12.12 US POSTAL SERVICE
  • US11842589B2 patent drawing
  • US11842589B2 patent drawing
  • US11842589B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, devices, and methods of locking a lockable volume. The lock may comprise a bolt and a slider. The slider moves linearly to move the bolt in position to engage a securement feature. The engagement of the bolt with the securement feature secures the securement feature, thereby locking the door to which the securement feature is attached.