Remote Machining Optimization via Acoustic and Vibration Signals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current machine tools rely on manual settings for machining parameters, leading to inefficiencies and time-consuming trial-and-error processes to optimize spindle speed and cut depth, especially when abnormal vibrations occur, resulting in delayed and ineffective maintenance.

Innovation Solution

A remote machining optimization system that includes input and receiving units for machining parameters, a processing unit with modules for generating and optimizing spindle speed and cut depth based on sound and vibration signals, and a communication unit to send optimized programs to machine tools, allowing remote adjustment and storage of optimal settings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual trial and error method is used to set machining parameters, then the machine tool can be operated, but the optimization process is time-consuming and inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining optimization efficiencyVSAvoidtime for parameter optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine tool system automatically monitors its own vibration signals and acoustic emissions during machining, and the controller autonomously adjusts machining parameters based on this self-diagnosis, eliminating the need for manual trial-and-error optimization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously receives feedback from vibration sensors and acoustic emission sensors, processes this information to detect chatter conditions, and automatically adjusts machining parameters in real-time to maintain optimal cutting conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If manual adjustment of machining parameters is performed, then the operator can control the process, but repeated testing and maintenance are required when abnormal vibration occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining process stabilityVSAvoidparameter adjustment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-diagnosis by continuously monitoring vibration and acoustic signals, automatically detecting chatter conditions without operator intervention, and self-corrects by adjusting machining parameters to eliminate chatter

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual operator judgment and mechanical adjustment with automated electronic sensing, signal processing, and computer-controlled parameter adjustment based on vibration and acoustic emission analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If traditional machining parameter setting is used, then the process can start, but the maximum effectiveness of the equipment cannot be achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment effectivenessVSAvoidoptimization system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller integrates multiple functions including machining control, vibration monitoring, acoustic emission analysis, chatter detection, and automatic parameter optimization into a single system, making the machine tool adaptable to various machining conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses vibration sensors and acoustic emission sensors as intermediaries to detect chatter conditions indirectly, and employs signal processing algorithms as intermediaries to analyze the sensed data and determine optimal parameter adjustments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient remote optimization of machining parameters, reducing the need for repeated testing and maintenance, and minimizing downtime by automatically adjusting spindle speed and cut depth to prevent chatter and ensure optimal cutting conditions.

Implementation Method 1

a receiving unit configured to receive a sound signal and a vibration signal from the machine tool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

a receiving unit configured to receive a sound signal and a vibration signal from the machine tool

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAcoustic emission: Acoustic Emission

Data Source

PatentUS10248104B2Optimizing machine operations using acoustics properties
Publication Date: 2019.04.02 IND TECH RES INST
  • US10248104B2 patent drawing
  • US10248104B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A remote machining optimization system for a machine tool is provided, which includes an input unit configured to input a machining parameter including a spindle speed and a cut depth; a receiving unit configured to receive sound signals and vibration signals from the machine tool; a processing unit configured to generate a machining program with a program generating module, to modify the spindle speed and the cut depth according to the sound signals with a speed optimization module and a depth optimization module, respectively; a communication unit configured to send the machining program to the machine tool; and a storage unit configured to store the modified spindle speed and the cut depth.