Remote Memory Encryption for Fine-Grain Access Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cryptographic computing systems face challenges in proactively blocking out-of-bound memory accesses and ensuring cryptographic isolation of memory regions, leading to potential data corruption and unauthorized access, particularly in fine-grain scenarios like virtual machines, applications, and threads.

Innovation Solution

Implement cryptographic isolation within processor cores by encrypting memory addresses and data using secret keys and tweaks, encoding pointers with metadata, and employing cryptographic algorithms to enforce memory access controls, thereby preventing unauthorized access and detecting corruption proactively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If cryptographic mechanisms are implemented inside processor components to encrypt data and pointers, then data security and confidentiality are improved, but device complexity and processing overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoidprocessor complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines cryptographic operations (encryption, decryption, authentication) directly into the processor core components, merging security functions with existing processing units. This integration encrypts data and pointers at the hardware level without requiring separate cryptographic devices, thereby improving security while managing complexity through consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The cryptographic mechanisms are designed to handle multiple functions including encryption of data, encryption of pointers, authentication of memory accesses, and detection of out-of-bound accesses. This multi-functional approach allows a single cryptographic subsystem to perform diverse security tasks, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If cryptographic operations are performed for every memory access to ensure security, then data protection is improved, but processing speed and productivity deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata protectionVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs cryptographic preparation in advance by encrypting pointers and metadata before memory access operations. The processor pre-computes authentication tags and encrypts address information ahead of time, so that during actual memory access, the cryptographic verification can proceed in parallel or with minimal overhead, thus protecting data while maintaining processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The cryptographic mechanisms operate continuously and seamlessly with normal processor operations. Encryption and authentication are integrated into the memory access pipeline so that security operations continue without interrupting the main processing flow, ensuring both data protection and sustained productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Measurement precision

If fine-grain cryptographic isolation is implemented for virtual machines and applications, then security precision is improved, but device complexity and overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveisolation precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements fine-grain cryptographic isolation by dividing memory spaces into distinct encrypted regions for different virtual machines and applications. Each segment receives unique encryption keys and authentication parameters, enabling precise isolation at the level of individual memory pages or structures. This segmentation allows high precision isolation while managing complexity through modular key management and localized cryptographic operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP4020290B1Cryptographic computing with remote memory
Publication Date: 2026.04.08 INTEL CORP
  • EP4020290B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4020290B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP4020290B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

In one embodiment, an application executing on a host node allocates a memory address of a remote node. The application selects, based at least in part on device capability information for the host and remote nodes, one of the host node or the remote node to encrypt application data, and configures the selected node to encrypt the application data based on a key and a pointer to the memory address of the remote node.