Remote Metadata Scanning for Restricted Content Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current computer forensic methods for identifying restricted content on a network are time-consuming, impractical, and inefficient, as they require physical access to hard drives and often produce numerous false positives, making it difficult to scan large networks effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for remotely accessing computer systems to retrieve metadata, comparing it to a database of known restricted content, and flagging matches, which allows for efficient identification of restricted content without physically handling hard drives or scanning entire file systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If full forensic scanning of hard drives is performed, then restricted content can be identified, but the process becomes extremely time-consuming and impractical for large networks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidscanning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the essential identifying features (metadata, hash values, file names, file types) from files instead of scanning entire file contents. This extraction approach maintains detection accuracy for restricted content while dramatically reducing scanning time and resource requirements, making network-wide scanning practical.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the file system scanning process into discrete manageable units by using file metadata and hash values as identification markers. Instead of processing continuous large file contents, the system scans segmented metadata structures, enabling efficient parallel processing and reducing overall scanning time while maintaining detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If physical access to hard drives is required for scanning, then comprehensive content analysis can be performed, but it becomes difficult to scan remote systems in networks that cannot be easily accessed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveforensic analysis completenessVSAvoidremote accessibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary approach by scanning file system metadata and using hash value comparison instead of requiring direct physical access to file contents. The metadata acts as an intermediary that can be accessed remotely through standard file system interfaces, enabling forensic analysis without physical drive removal while maintaining detection accuracy through hash matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If algorithms analyze stored data for restricted content, then content can be discovered, but thousands of false positives are produced requiring extensive verification

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontent detection capabilityVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses hash values (digital fingerprints) as copies or representations of file contents for comparison purposes. Instead of analyzing actual file contents which lead to false positives, the system compares hash value copies against known restricted content hashes, maintaining detection capability while eliminating false positives caused by misinterpretation of actual file data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20240356988A1System and method for remote storage device scanning using a remote agent for detecting restricted content therein
Publication Date: 2024.10.24 HUMMEL STEVE
  • US20240356988A1 patent drawing
  • US20240356988A1 patent drawing
  • US20240356988A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present invention provide a method and apparatus for remotely accessing a computer system or network to identify storage devices and to retrieve metadata from the storage devices that are respectively unique to files stored in the storage devices. An agent is executed by the computer system and receives scanning instructions from a server. A scanning tool compares the metadata retrieved from the computer system or network to a database or list of known metadata of known restricted content. Metadata retrieved from the computer system or network that matches metadata from the database or list of known restricted content is flagged and the file associated with the matching metadata is flagged and reported as potentially storing restricted content. During the scanning, restricted content itself is not scanned, not copied, not transferred and not stored.