Remote Consultation System for Money Handling Apparatus

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In financial institutions, the reduction in branch staff due to labor shortages, work style reforms, and low profit structures has made it challenging for customers to operate money handling apparatuses independently, leading to potential inefficiencies and errors in transactions.

Innovation Solution

A financial transaction system that includes a money handling apparatus operable by customers, a remote conversation system for consultations with remote consultants, an output unit for displaying transaction information, an obtaining unit for reading this information, and a transaction processor for executing transactions based on the information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If customers operate money handling apparatuses independently to reduce branch staff, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to customers not being accustomed to operating the apparatus

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebranch staff efficiencyVSAvoidtransaction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a remote consultant as an intermediary who provides guidance to customers operating money handling apparatuses. The consultant communicates with the customer during the transaction process, helping them navigate the apparatus operations correctly. This mediator resolves the contradiction by enabling independent customer operation (improving productivity) while providing expert oversight (maintaining reliability).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the money handling apparatus communicates transaction status and requirements to both the customer and remote consultant. This real-time feedback loop allows the customer to understand the transaction progress while the consultant can intervene if errors are detected, thus maintaining reliability while enabling independent operation for productivity improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If remote consultants provide complex financial consultation, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases requiring additional support staff

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinancial consultation capabilityVSAvoidtransaction system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The remote consultant acts as an intermediary who handles complex financial consultation requirements. Instead of embedding complex decision-making logic in the money handling apparatus itself, the system uses the human consultant as an intelligent mediator who can adapt to various financial scenarios. This approach maintains adaptability while avoiding the need to increase the technical complexity of the automated apparatus.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The remote consultant terminal is designed as a universal platform that can handle multiple types of financial consultations (investments, inheritances, loans, etc.) through a single interface. This multi-functional design provides adaptability across different financial services without requiring separate specialized systems for each service type, thus avoiding device complexity multiplication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If clerks are reduced to save human resources, then productivity is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates as customers lack guidance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehuman resource efficiencyVSAvoidcustomer operation difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The remote consultant serves as a virtual intermediary who provides the guidance and support previously offered by in-branch clerks. Through video communication and remote control capabilities, the consultant can guide customers through apparatus operations in real-time, making the system as easy to operate as having a physical clerk present. This enables human resource reduction while maintaining ease of operation through the digital intermediary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical presence of physical clerks with a digital communication system. The remote consultant terminal uses video calls, audio communication, and electronic displays to provide guidance, substituting the physical interaction between clerk and customer with digital-mediated interaction. This substitution reduces human resources while maintaining operational ease through technology-enabled communication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If clerks make phone calls to confirm consultation content, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases reducing work efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction accuracyVSAvoidconfirmation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges the confirmation process into the existing remote consultation interface. Instead of separate phone calls, the consultant can directly view and confirm transaction details through the integrated terminal system that already connects the customer, apparatus, and consultant. This consolidation eliminates the need for additional communication steps while maintaining reliability through the same confirmation objective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The money handling apparatus provides real-time feedback to both the customer and remote consultant during the transaction process. Transaction details, status updates, and confirmation requests are automatically communicated through the system interface, eliminating the need for manual phone confirmations. This automated feedback mechanism maintains reliability by ensuring accurate information exchange while significantly reducing the time required for confirmations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250190997A1Financial transaction system, money handling apparatus, and financial transaction method
Publication Date: 2025.06.12 GLORY LTD
  • US20250190997A1 patent drawing
  • US20250190997A1 patent drawing
  • US20250190997A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A financial transaction system includes: a money handling apparatus configured to be operated by a customer; a remote conversation system enabling a remote conversation between the customer and a consultant attending to the customer; an output unit included in the remote conversation system and configured to output transaction information indicative of content of a money transaction determined in the remote conversation; an obtaining unit configured to obtain the transaction information; and a transaction processor configured to execute transaction processing based on the transaction information.