Remote Parking Assistant Error Classification for Safe Maneuvers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remotely controlled parking systems lack robust error handling and communication fault management, which can lead to unsafe operations and driver confusion in case of errors or connection issues during parking maneuvers.

Innovation Solution

A method that reads and evaluates status data to assign states to classes, generating control and information records to handle error scenarios, differentiate between recoverable and non-recoverable faults, and inform the driver about errors to facilitate corrective actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If remote-controlled parking is implemented without comprehensive error handling, then the system is simpler to operate, but safety and reliability are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary checks of status data before executing the parking maneuver. Error conditions are detected and evaluated in advance, allowing the system to prevent unsafe operations before they occur. This includes checking communication status, sensor functionality, and system readiness states prior to initiating remote parking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors status data during the parking maneuver and provides feedback about system state and error conditions. This feedback mechanism allows real-time detection of faults and enables the system to respond appropriately by aborting maneuvers or alerting the driver, thereby maintaining safety without requiring overly complex preventive measures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Difficulty of detecting and measuring

If comprehensive status monitoring is implemented, then error detection capability is improved, but the complexity of processing and responding to errors increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveerror detection capabilityVSAvoiderror handling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Difficulty of detecting and measuringVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Error handling is segmented into distinct state classes (e.g., recoverable errors, non-recoverable errors, warning states). Each state class has predetermined handling procedures, which simplifies the complexity by breaking down the error response into manageable segments rather than requiring complex decision logic for every possible error condition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of error classification by categorizing errors into discrete state classes based on their severity and recoverability. This parameter change from continuous error analysis to discrete state classification simplifies the processing complexity while maintaining comprehensive error detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If the driver is continuously informed about all error conditions, then awareness and ability to take corrective measures is improved, but information overload may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver awarenessVSAvoiddriver usability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

Information is provided with local quality by tailoring the type and amount of information to the specific error state and context. Critical errors receive prominent attention, while less severe conditions are communicated differently. This ensures the driver receives necessary information without being overwhelmed by unnecessary details.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system converts potentially harmful error conditions into beneficial information by clearly communicating the nature and severity of errors to the driver. By framing errors as actionable information with clear state classifications, the system turns negative situations into opportunities for informed driver decision-making and corrective action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Data Source

PatentUS12168446B2Method for operating a motor vehicle with a remotely controlled parking assistant
Publication Date: 2024.12.17 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US12168446B2 patent drawing
  • US12168446B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for operating a motor vehicle (2) with a remotely controlled parking assistant (6), with the steps: (S100) Reading in status data (SD) indicative of a status (S1, S2, S3, S4), (S200) Determination of at least one state (Z1, Z2) by evaluating the status data (SD), (S300) Assigning the specific state (Z1, Z2) to a state class (K1, K2) of a plurality of state classes (K1, K2), and (S400) Outputting a control data record (AS1, AS2) that is assigned to the assigned state class (K1, K2) and/or (S600) outputting an information data record (IS1, IS2) that is assigned to the assigned state class (K1, K2).