Remote Plasma Unit Ignition Control for Semiconductor Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The remote plasma unit (RPU) in semiconductor-processing apparatuses often fails to ignite after a certain period of inactivity, leading to reduced throughput and increased operational costs due to the need for manual intervention and potential electrode damage, especially during wafer lot replacements.

Innovation Solution

An automatic ignition control function is integrated into the semiconductor-processing apparatus controller to monitor idle periods and execute a specific recipe for RPU ignition, adjusting the ignition interval using dichotomy based on successful or unsuccessful ignition attempts to optimize the timing and prevent failures.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the RPU is ignited at frequent intervals to ensure reliability, then ignition reliability is improved, but operational costs and gas consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition reliabilityVSAvoidgas consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary ignition actions at scheduled intervals during idle periods before the RPU is actually needed. This proactive approach ensures the RPU remains in a ready state without waiting for failure to occur, balancing reliability with resource efficiency by igniting only when strategically necessary rather than continuously or reactively

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system monitors ignition status and operational state of the RPU, using this feedback to dynamically adjust the ignition schedule. The control unit decides whether to ignite based on current state information, optimizing the balance between maintaining reliability and minimizing unnecessary gas consumption during idle periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the RPU ignition interval is set too short, then ignition reliability is improved, but unnecessary costs incur due to frequent gas flow

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition success rateVSAvoidgas usage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous or overly frequent ignition, the system implements periodic ignition actions during designated idle periods. This rhythmic approach maintains reliability by ensuring the RPU is periodically activated while minimizing gas consumption by avoiding unnecessary ignitions during active processing or when the RPU is already in a ready state

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Loss of energy

If the RPU is not ignited for extended periods, then operational costs are reduced, but ignition failure occurs and throughput is lowered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational costVSAvoidwafer processing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary ignition actions during idle periods before extended inactivity would cause failure. This ensures the RPU remains in a reliable state without requiring continuous operation, thereby maintaining productivity while reducing operational costs during non-critical periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the ignition timing parameters based on operational patterns and idle period duration. By changing the ignition schedule parameters adaptively, the system optimizes the balance between maintaining readiness (throughput) and reducing operational costs during varying production demands

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures reliable RPU ignition at optimal intervals, maintaining high wafer processing throughput and reducing operational costs by preventing unnecessary gas flow during idle states and addressing ignition difficulties caused by residual gas or moisture.

Implementation Method 1

a plasma is generated in a remote plasma unit (RPU) 5 provided outside the process container 1, F radicals 6 are generated by decomposing a fluorinated gas by the plasma

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma: Plasma

Implementation Method 2

F radicals 6 are generated by decomposing a fluorinated gas by the plasma

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDecomposition: Decomposition (biological)

Implementation Method 3

igniting an ignition plug of the RPU prior to cleaning processing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric discharge: Electric Glow Discharge

Data Source

PatentUS7571732B2Ignition control of remote plasma unit
Publication Date: 2009.08.11 ASM JAPAN
  • US7571732B2 patent drawing
  • US7571732B2 patent drawing
  • US7571732B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of maintaining a remote plasma unit for cleaning a semiconductor-processing apparatus includes: (i) detecting if the semiconductor-processing apparatus is in an idle state; (ii) if the idle state is detected, igniting the remote plasma unit for cleaning the semiconductor-processing apparatus after a lapse of a given time period; (iii) detecting if the remote plasma unit is ignited in step (ii); and (iv) if the remote plasma unit is not ignited in step (ii), retrying ignition of the remote plasma unit.