Remote Automatic Racking for Network Protectors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Network protectors require manual operation, exposing workers to arc flash hazards and necessitating bulky personal protective equipment, which is uncomfortable and dissuades proper use.

Innovation Solution

A remote automatic racking system for network protectors, utilizing a motor-driven gear box assembly with magnets and a magneto-resistive sensor to control the racking mechanism, allowing for safe operation from a distance and eliminating the need for manual handling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual operation of network protectors is used, then workers can directly control the racking mechanism, but workers are exposed to arc flash hazards and must wear bulky PPE

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDirect control of racking mechanismVSAvoidArc flash exposure to workers
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical operation system with an automated motor-driven racking mechanism. The motor assembly, controlled by a controller that receives commands from a remote interface, eliminates the need for workers to physically manipulate the network protector or crank the racking mechanism, thereby substituting mechanical human operation with an automated electromechanical system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a remote interface and control system as an intermediary between the operator and the network protector. This intermediary allows the operator to issue commands from a safe distance, and the controller translates these commands into automated motor-driven racking operations, mediating the interaction to eliminate direct exposure to hazardous areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If manual handling of network protectors is required, then simple mechanical mechanisms can be used, but worker safety is compromised and operational comfort is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveMechanical racking mechanismVSAvoidWorker safety during operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the simple manual mechanical racking mechanism with an automated electromechanical system comprising a motor assembly, drive train, and controller. This substitution maintains the mechanical racking function while adding automation to eliminate worker exposure to arc flash hazards, thereby improving reliability in terms of worker safety without compromising the core mechanical functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If remote automatic racking is implemented, then worker safety is improved by preventing exposure to energized bus work, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveExposure to energized bus workVSAvoidRemote control system
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a remote interface and control system as an intermediary between the operator and the network protector. This intermediary allows the operator to issue commands from a safe distance, and the controller translates these commands into automated motor-driven racking operations, mediating the interaction to eliminate direct exposure to hazardous areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical operation system with an automated motor-driven racking mechanism. The motor assembly, controlled by a controller that receives commands from a remote interface, eliminates the need for workers to physically manipulate the network protector or crank the racking mechanism, thereby substituting mechanical human operation with an automated electromechanical system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Reliability

If precise monitoring and protection of breakers is maintained during remote operation, then breaker safety is ensured, but control mechanism complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveBreaker protection during rackingVSAvoidControl and monitoring system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms through the controller that monitors the racking mechanism's position and status. The controller receives feedback from sensors and position indicators to verify the network protector has reached the correct position (connected, disconnected, or test position), ensuring precise monitoring and protection while maintaining automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances worker safety by preventing exposure to energized bus work and maintaining precise monitoring and protection of breakers, reducing the risk of injury and improving operational comfort.

Implementation Method 1

A remote automatic racking system for network protectors, utilizing a motor-driven gear box assembly with magnets and a magneto-resistive sensor to control the racking mechanism

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagneto-resistive effect: Magnetoresistance

Data Source

PatentUS8319123B2System, network protector enclosure, and automatic racking system
Publication Date: 2012.11.27 EATON INTELLIGENT POWER LTD
  • US8319123B2 patent drawing
  • US8319123B2 patent drawing
  • US8319123B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes an electrical enclosure having an inner volume and a door structured to open to expose the inner volume and structured to close to enclose the inner volume. A racking mechanism is disposed in the inner volume and includes a member movable in a first direction to a first position and an opposite second direction to a different second position. A network protector is carried by the racking mechanism and is movable thereby between a connect position in the inner volume corresponding to the first position of the member of the racking mechanism, and a test position in the inner volume corresponding to the different second position of the member of the racking mechanism. A control mechanism is structured to move the member of the racking mechanism between the first position and the different second position of the member responsive to a number of remote commands.