Remote Storage IOPS Optimization via Batch Aggregation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for performing read/write operations to remote storage are slow due to network roundtrips and potential IOPS limits, leading to degraded application performance, especially during peak periods with unpredictable workloads.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that dynamically aggregates read and write requests into batches, allowing these batches to be asynchronously passed to remote storage, thereby bypassing the transaction rate limitations of remote storage while ensuring transaction atomicity and consistency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If read/write requests are processed individually to remote storage, then transaction atomicity and consistency are ensured, but I/O operations per second (IOPS) are limited by network roundtrips and remote storage transaction rate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIOPS to remote storageVSAvoidTime for network roundtrips
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by buffering multiple read/write requests locally before sending them to remote storage. The batch buffer accumulates requests and sends them in consolidated batches, reducing the number of network roundtrips. This preliminary buffering action allows the system to overcome the limitation of individual request processing while maintaining data consistency through periodic flush operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges multiple individual read/write requests into consolidated batches before transmission to remote storage. By combining multiple operations into single batch requests, the system reduces network overhead and increases IOPS. The merging process groups compatible operations together while maintaining their semantic integrity and atomicity guarantees.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Productivity

If requests are aggregated into batches for remote storage, then IOPS performance improves, but complexity of managing batch aggregation and async operations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIOPS to remote storageVSAvoidBatch aggregation management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a batch buffer as an intermediary component between the application and remote storage. This mediator manages the complexity of batch aggregation, async operations, and consistency guarantees by providing a standardized interface. The batch buffer handles request queuing, batching logic, async transmission, and coordination with local storage, isolating the application from these complexities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the storage operation into distinct phases: local buffering, batch aggregation, async remote transmission, and consistency coordination. By dividing the overall operation into separable segments, the system manages complexity more effectively. Each segment can be optimized independently and failures can be handled at specific boundaries without affecting the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Speed

If local cache is used for non-transaction-based applications, then read/write operation speed improves, but data consistency between local and remote storage may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveRead/write operation speedVSAvoidData consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its operation mode based on the application's requirements. For non-transaction-based applications, it enables local cache operations that prioritize speed, allowing reads and writes to proceed locally without immediate remote synchronization. The system dynamically manages the flush policy and consistency model based on workload characteristics, transitioning between performance-optimized and consistency-optimized modes as needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12321605B2Optimizing input/output operations per section of remote persistent storage
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12321605B2 patent drawing
  • US12321605B2 patent drawing
  • US12321605B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented method for optimizing input/output (I/O) operations per second (IOPS) of remote storage. The computer-implemented method includes receiving requests for read operations and write operations from users of an application, dynamically creating batches into which the requests can be aggregated, aggregating the requests into the batches and asynchronously passing each completed batch to the remote storage.