Remote Supervision Control for Relaxed Autonomous Driving Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Remote operation systems place a heavy burden on the remote operating party due to limited field of view and increased operational demands, particularly when the moving body deviates from autonomous driving conditions.

Innovation Solution

An information processing method and system that detect a first operation by a supervising party, relax the execution conditions for autonomous driving, and allow the moving body to continue driving autonomously under these relaxed conditions, with tightened restrictions to ensure safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the moving body drives autonomously under strict execution conditions, then safety is improved, but the operational burden on the remote operating party increases due to frequent interventions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidoperational burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the execution conditions adjustable rather than fixed. The control device dynamically changes the execution conditions based on the operational state, allowing the system to transition between strict conditions (for safety) and relaxed conditions (for ease of operation). This is achieved through the operation condition change device that modifies execution conditions in response to operations by the remote operating party.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of execution conditions based on operational context. When the moving body operates normally, stricter parameters are applied for safety. When the remote operating party performs operations, the parameters are relaxed to reduce operational burden. This parameter adaptation allows the system to balance safety and ease of operation under different circumstances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the field of view of the remote operation screen is expanded, then the supervisory capability is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesupervisory capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends the supervisory capability from a single remote location to multiple locations by adding spatial dimensions to the supervision system. The plurality of supervision devices can be positioned at different locations, each with its own field of view, collectively providing comprehensive coverage without requiring any single device to have overly complex optics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent makes the execution conditions universally applicable across multiple supervision devices and operational scenarios. The same relaxed execution conditions apply to all supervision devices, allowing them to function uniformly under the same rules, which simplifies the overall system architecture compared to having device-specific complex control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Ease of operation

If the execution conditions are relaxed to reduce operational burden, then ease of operation is improved, but safety may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational burdenVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts execution conditions based on real-time operational context. When the remote operating party is actively operating, conditions are relaxed for ease of operation. When normal autonomous operation occurs, stricter conditions apply for safety. This dynamic adaptation ensures that safety is maintained when needed while reducing burden when appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes execution parameters conditionally based on operational state. The control device monitors whether the moving body is operating normally or requires remote intervention, and adjusts the execution condition parameters accordingly. This parameter switching mechanism ensures that relaxed parameters (reducing burden) are only applied when safe to do so.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12497075B2Information processing method and information processing system
Publication Date: 2025.12.16 PANASONIC INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CO LTD
  • US12497075B2 patent drawing
  • US12497075B2 patent drawing
  • US12497075B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing method is an information processing method executed by a computer, and includes: detecting a first operation by a supervising party that supervises a moving body which drives autonomously from a remote location where the moving body cannot be supervised directly; and when the first operation is detected, relaxing an execution condition for autonomous driving of the moving body more than an execution condition applied when the first operation is not detected, and causing the moving body to drive autonomously under the execution condition that has been relaxed.