Remote Support Control for Safe Worker-Proximity Handover

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing remote operation support systems fail to ensure smooth transition between remote and manual operation of working machines, leading to disruptions and inefficiencies when a worker is near the machine, as they require manual intervention to prevent remote operation.

Innovation Solution

A remote support system with a controller and notifier that allows for seamless transitions between remote and manual operation based on worker proximity, using communication terminals to send and receive notifications and control the working machine accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the remote operation support system prohibits remote operation when a worker is near the working machine, then worker safety is improved, but operational efficiency deteriorates due to manual intervention requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworker safetyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of worker proximity through communication terminals before remote operation begins. When a worker is detected near the machine, the system proactively notifies the remote operator and automatically prohibits remote operation in advance, preventing safety issues before they occur while maintaining operational efficiency through automated prevention rather than manual intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors worker proximity through communication terminals and provides real-time feedback to the remote operator. When a worker enters the prohibited zone, the system sends notifications and automatically adjusts operation permissions, creating a closed-loop control system that maintains safety while minimizing disruption to operational flow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If the system requires human remote manipulator to notify worker to leave before remote operation, then worker awareness is improved, but operation smoothness deteriorates due to communication delays

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworker awarenessVSAvoidoperation smoothness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs the notification function through communication terminals without requiring manual intervention from the remote operator. The communication terminal autonomously detects worker presence, sends notifications to the worker's device, and manages the prohibition of remote operation, freeing the remote operator from communication tasks and maintaining operational smoothness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system sends notifications to workers in advance through communication terminals before remote operation is prohibited. This preliminary notification ensures workers are aware of upcoming restrictions and can prepare accordingly, reducing last-minute disruptions and maintaining operational flow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the remote operation is prohibited in advance when worker is near, then safety is improved, but worker productivity deteriorates as worker does not know when remote operation will occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveworker safetyVSAvoidworker productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides real-time feedback through communication terminals to workers about their proximity status and upcoming remote operation prohibitions. Workers receive continuous updates about when remote operation will be prohibited, allowing them to plan their activities accordingly and maintain productivity while ensuring safety through informed decision-making

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20260044147A1Remote support system
Publication Date: 2026.02.12 KUBOTA CORP
  • US20260044147A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044147A1 patent drawing
  • US20260044147A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A remote support system includes a remote device to remotely manipulate a working vehicle, a controller provided in or on the working vehicle and configured or programmed to control the working vehicle based on remote manipulation information relating to a remote manipulation from the remote device, and a notifier to provide a notification indicating that the remote manipulation is to be performed when the working vehicle receives the remote manipulation information sent from the remote device and provide a notification indicating that a manual manipulation or a repair is to be performed when the remote device receives information relating to the manual manipulation or the repair of the working vehicle.