Remote Unlocking Mechanism for Vehicle Lifting Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing portable mechanical lifting devices for vehicles lack a safe, cost-effective, and space-saving mechanism for blocking and unlocking that prevents self-closure in case of actuator failure, posing risks to users and requiring manual intervention.

Innovation Solution

A remote-operated hydraulic linear actuator system with a pneumatic or electromechanical actuator and Bowden cable mechanism allows for safe and easy blocking and unlocking of lifting devices, using a pedal or valve for remote operation, suitable for portable devices with low weight and encumbrance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a mechanical blocking device is provided to prevent self-closure of the mechanism, then safety is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical blocking devices with a simpler system using a percussion element that can be remotely activated. Instead of complex mechanical interlocks, the solution uses a percussive action delivered through a Bowden cable or pneumatic/hydraulic actuator to disengage the blocking means, reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining safety functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a percussion element as an intermediary between the user and the blocking mechanism. This intermediary delivers the unlocking action remotely through a transmission mechanism (Bowden cable, pneumatic, or hydraulic), allowing the user to unlock the device from a safe distance without directly interacting with the complex blocking mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a blocking device is provided to prevent self-closure, then safety is improved, but dimensions and weight increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential safety function from complex mechanical blocking devices and implements it through a simplified system. The blocking means is designed to be minimalistic, with the primary safety function achieved through strategic placement of blocking elements rather than complex mechanical structures, thereby reducing weight while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The blocking means is designed to be temporarily engaged during operation and easily disengaged when needed. The system allows the blocking elements to be discarded (disengaged) through remote percussion action, and can be recovered (re-engaged) by resetting the mechanism, providing safety only when necessary rather than through permanent heavy structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #34Discarding and recovering

3Device complexity

If manual blocking operation is required, then device complexity is reduced, but ease of operation deteriorates due to user risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a percussion element as an intermediary between the user and the blocking mechanism. This intermediary delivers the unlocking action remotely through a transmission mechanism (Bowden cable, pneumatic, or hydraulic), allowing the user to unlock the device from a safe distance without directly interacting with the complex blocking mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex mechanical blocking devices with a simpler system using a percussion element that can be remotely activated. Instead of complex mechanical interlocks, the solution uses a percussive action delivered through a Bowden cable or pneumatic/hydraulic actuator to disengage the blocking means, reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining safety functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Ease of operation

If remote unlocking system is implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex electronic remote unlocking systems with simpler pneumatic or hydraulic actuation systems. Instead of electronics, sensors, and control circuits, the solution uses pneumatic or hydraulic pressure to activate the percussion element, achieving remote operation with reduced complexity and cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs pneumatic or hydraulic actuators to deliver the percussion action remotely. Compressed air or hydraulic fluid is used to drive the percussion element through a transmission mechanism, providing reliable remote operation without the complexity of electronic control systems, while maintaining ease of operation through simple pressure activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system ensures user safety by preventing self-closure of lifting devices during actuator failure, is lightweight, cost-effective, and easy to use, enabling simultaneous operation of multiple devices with a single control unit.

Implementation Method 1

the unlocking means comprises also a spring arranged to keep the percussion element in the first position

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The actuating means comprises a hydraulic linear actuator

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic force: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 3

the linear actuator is a pneumatic actuator and the driving means comprises a pneumatic duct arranged to connect the pneumatic actuator with a source of compressed air

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic force: Pressurisation

Data Source

PatentEP3293146B1Mechanical lifting device for vehicles
Publication Date: 2019.04.24 CMO SRL
  • EP3293146B1 patent drawingFigure 1~1A
  • EP3293146B1 patent drawingFigure 2~2A
  • EP3293146B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system for lifting vehicles by a ground, said system comprising at least one lifting device (100,100') comprising a support base (110,110') and a mechanism (120,120') arranged to pass between a lower position, where the support base (110,110') is located close to the ground, and an upper position, where the support base (110,110') is located at a predetermined distance from the ground. The lifting device (100,100') comprises then actuating means (130,130') configured for actuating the mechanism (120,120') to make it pass between the lower position and the upper position, blocking means (140,140') arranged to block the mechanism (120,120') in the upper position, and an unlocking means (150,150') arranged to deactivate the blocking means (140,140') for unlocking the mechanism (120,120') from the upper position. In particular, the lifting device (100,100') also comprises driving means (200) arranged to operate the unlocking means (150,150') in a mechanical way and by a remote position with respect to the or to each lifting device (100,100'). [Fig.2,2A]