Remote Vehicle Anomaly Detection for Coordinated Hazard Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods rely on individual drivers to notice and respond to anomalous vehicle behavior, leading to inconsistent and potentially risky mitigating actions, as each driver may interpret and react to the situation differently, resulting in a heightened risk of accidents and injuries.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses sensors and processors to monitor and analyze vehicle behavior, comparing real-time data to historical patterns to detect anomalous behavior and automatically alert nearby vehicles and public safety authorities, enabling coordinated and timely mitigating actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If individual drivers manually monitor and respond to anomalous vehicle behavior, then driver autonomy and simplicity of the system are maintained, but response consistency and safety reliability deteriorate due to human error and inconsistent reactions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle system autonomously monitors its own behavior and automatically detects anomalous conditions without requiring external human intervention. The onboard sensors and processors continuously analyze vehicle operation data, compare it against learned normal patterns, and trigger alerts when deviations are detected, enabling the system to self-diagnose and self-report safety issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensor data from vehicle operations is constantly fed into the anomaly detection algorithm. The system learns from historical data what constitutes normal behavior and provides real-time feedback when deviations occur. This feedback mechanism enables automatic adjustment and improvement of detection accuracy over time while maintaining consistent safety responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If real-time sensor monitoring and automated anomaly detection are implemented, then response consistency and safety reliability improve, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse consistencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The anomaly detection system is designed to work with multiple types of sensors and vehicle operations data simultaneously. The same core detection algorithm can identify various types of anomalous behavior across different vehicle contexts. This multi-functional approach allows a single system to handle diverse safety scenarios without requiring separate specialized systems for each function, thereby managing complexity while maintaining comprehensive monitoring capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of vehicle behavior patterns during normal operation to establish baseline expectations. By pre-learning what constitutes normal vehicle operation through continuous data collection and pattern recognition, the system is prepared to quickly identify anomalies when they occur. This preliminary action reduces the computational burden during critical detection moments and enables faster, more consistent responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If automated anomaly detection and alert systems are deployed, then accident prevention capability improves, but data processing requirements and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccident prevention capabilityVSAvoidcomputational energy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies anomaly detection algorithms selectively rather than continuously analyzing all sensor data at full computational intensity. Normal operation data is monitored with baseline processing, while suspicious or borderline cases trigger more intensive analysis. This partial action approach maintains high accident prevention capability by focusing computational resources on critical detection moments while reducing overall energy consumption during steady-state operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses simplified models and representative data samples to perform initial anomaly screening before committing full computational resources. By creating simplified representations of vehicle behavior patterns and using these copies for preliminary detection, the system reduces the computational energy required for continuous full-scale analysis while maintaining effective accident prevention through layered detection strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20230386331A1Technology for real-time detection and mitigation of remote vehicle anomalous behavior
Publication Date: 2023.11.30 STATE FARM MUTAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US20230386331A1 patent drawing
  • US20230386331A1 patent drawing
  • US20230386331A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for real-time detection and mitigation anomalous behavior of a remote vehicle are provided, e.g., vehicle behavior that is consistent with distracted or unexpectedly disabled driving. On-board and off-board sensors associated with a subject vehicle may monitor the subject vehicle's environment, and behavior characteristics of a remote vehicle operating within the subject vehicle's environment may be determined based upon collected sensor data. The remote vehicle's behavior characteristics may be utilized to detect or determine the presence of anomalous behavior, which may be anomalous for the current contextual conditions of the vehicles' environment. Mitigating actions for detected remote vehicle anomalous behaviors may be suggested and/or automatically implemented at the subject vehicle and/or at proximate vehicles to avoid or reduce the risk of accidents, injury, or death resulting from the anomalous behavior. In some situations, authorities may be notified.