Remote Vehicle Autonomous Self-Righting and Retrotraverse Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional remote vehicle operation is complex due to electro-mechanical complexity, requiring extensive operator training and manual dexterity, as it involves numerous function-specific controls, making it difficult to navigate and control vehicles accurately.

Innovation Solution

A system that allows operators to switch between tele-operation and autonomous behaviors, utilizing a control unit, GPS receiver, inertial measurement unit, and navigation CPU, along with a manipulator arm and stereo vision module, to execute autonomous behaviors such as retro traverse and self-righting, reducing the need for manual control.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional tele-operation control is used, then the remote vehicle can be controlled manually, but the operator requires extensive training and manual dexterity due to electro-mechanical complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of controlVSAvoidelectro-mechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The remote vehicle performs autonomous behaviors (self-service) such as retro traverse, re-traverse, and self-righting without operator intervention. The vehicle uses its own sensors (GPS, IMU, stereo vision) and control system to execute these behaviors independently, reducing the burden on the operator and simplifying control while maintaining the ability to handle complex situations autonomously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If manual control with multiple function-specific controls is used, then the remote vehicle can be precisely controlled, but extensive operator training is required to develop sufficient manual dexterity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation accuracyVSAvoidoperator training requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical control operations with autonomous electronic control systems. The vehicle uses electronic sensors (GPS receiver, inertial measurement unit, stereo vision module) and a control system to automatically execute navigation and manipulation tasks, substituting the need for operator manual dexterity with automated electronic control while maintaining high precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If autonomous behaviors are implemented, then operator control is simplified, but the vehicle requires additional sensors and control systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplificationVSAvoidsensor and control system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is designed with multi-functionality to handle both tele-operation and autonomous behaviors. The same control system processes inputs from multiple sensors (GPS, IMU, stereo vision) and executes different types of operations (navigation, manipulation, self-righting) through a unified architecture, reducing the need for separate dedicated systems for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS8447440B2Autonomous behaviors for a remote vehicle
Publication Date: 2013.05.21 FLIR DETECTION INC
  • US8447440B2 patent drawing
  • US8447440B2 patent drawing
  • US8447440B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method comprising running a persistent self-righting behavior comprising sensing an orientation of the remote vehicle and performing a progression of flipper movements until the remote vehicle is righted, and performing a retrotraverse behavior comprising: generating a list of time stamped waypoints separated by at least a minimum difference in time and distance; storing the list of time stamped waypoints in the memory; and generating, using a control system, a current return path interconnecting previously-traversed waypoints in reverse order of timestamps upon losing communication with the operator control unit or upon receiving a command from the operator control unit.