Remote Vehicle Hazard Scoring for Erratic Driver Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current collision avoidance systems fail to detect collision risks caused by unexpected driver actions and erratic behaviors, as well as damaged vehicle components.

Innovation Solution

A system equipped with a vehicle sensor, GNSS, and a controller that determines classification scores for a remote vehicle based on measurements, including speed, position, and environmental factors, to calculate an overall hazard score and take appropriate actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If current collision avoidance systems use sensors to detect objects in the environment, then they can prevent and reduce the severity of vehicular collisions with remote vehicles, pedestrians, and structures, but they fail to detect collision risks caused by unexpected driver actions and erratic driving behaviors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection of erratic driving behaviors
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the hazard detection task into multiple classification scores: position and speed violation scores, mutual interaction violation scores, anomaly detection scores, traffic rule violation scores, and visual hazard scores. Each score evaluates a specific aspect of remote vehicle behavior, allowing the system to comprehensively detect both normal and erratic driving patterns that single-metric systems miss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from traditional single-metric collision detection to a multi-dimensional evaluation framework by calculating multiple classification scores simultaneously. This dimensional expansion enables detection of subtle erratic behaviors across different dimensions (position, speed, interactions, anomalies, visual hazards) that individual metrics cannot capture alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If the system calculates multiple classification scores including position violations, speed violations, mutual interaction violations, anomaly detection, traffic rule violations, and visual hazards, then it improves detection accuracy of hazardous vehicles, but it increases computational complexity and processing time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard detection accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex hazard detection problem is segmented into six distinct classification score calculations, each focusing on a specific hazard dimension. This segmentation allows the system to process different aspects of vehicle behavior independently and combine results, making the overall complex task manageable through modular computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The controller performs multiple functions simultaneously: it monitors position, speed, interactions, anomalies, traffic rules, and visual hazards all through one integrated hazard scoring system. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate detection systems into a single unified controller, reducing overall system complexity despite the multiple metrics evaluated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If the system determines classification scores based on multiple factors including road characteristics, road conditions, and hazard statuses, then it improves the accuracy of hazard assessment, but it increases the time required to process and analyze data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazard assessment accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system determines acceptable speed ranges and evaluates road characteristics, conditions, and hazard statuses in advance before final hazard scoring. By pre-processing environmental context data and establishing baseline safety parameters, the system reduces real-time computation requirements during critical hazard assessment moments, balancing accuracy with processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12365335B2Detection of distracted drivers
Publication Date: 2025.07.22 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US12365335B2 patent drawing
  • US12365335B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for detecting hazards for a vehicle includes a vehicle sensor for determining information about an environment surrounding the vehicle and a global navigation satellite system (GNSS). The system also includes a controller in electrical communication with the vehicle sensor and the GNSS. The controller is programmed to perform a plurality of measurements. The controller is further programmed to determine a plurality of classification scores of the first remote vehicle based at least in part on the plurality of measurements of the first remote vehicle and to determine an overall hazard score of the first remote vehicle based at least in part on the plurality of classification scores of the first remote vehicle. The controller is further programmed to take an action based at least in part on the overall hazard score of the first remote vehicle.