Remote Vehicle Operation Using Adaptive Software Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle systems lack effective methods for remote operation and management, particularly in scenarios where inoperability exceeds a threshold, necessitating immediate and safe intervention.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for remotely operating a vehicle using software updates and dynamic models, leveraging sensors and machine learning to assess inoperability, and enabling safe maneuvering through intelligent software adjustments and vehicle-to-vehicle communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If remote operation of the vehicle is implemented, then the ability to operate the vehicle when inoperability exceeds a threshold is improved, but the system complexity increases due to software installation and update requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote operation capabilityVSAvoidsoftware management system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically installing required software on the vehicle before remote operation begins. The server sends software packages to the vehicle, which then installs them autonomously, ensuring the vehicle is prepared for remote operation without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The vehicle system serves itself by automatically managing software installation and updates during remote operation. The system monitors its own operational status, requests necessary software updates, installs them, and continues operation without requiring external technical assistance for each software management task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If software updates are continuously received and installed during remote operation, then the reliability of remote operation is improved, but the operation time is reduced due to installation interruptions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveremote operation reliabilityVSAvoidcontinuous operation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDuration of action of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system maintains continuity of useful action by seamlessly integrating software updates into the ongoing remote operation. The vehicle continues to be remotely operated throughout the software installation process, with the system managing updates in the background without completely halting operational functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements periodic action by scheduling software updates at appropriate intervals during remote operation. Rather than continuous updating, the system periodically checks for updates, installs them at strategically chosen moments, and resumes operation, balancing reliability improvements with operational continuity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Productivity

If the vehicle remotely operates itself, then the productivity of vehicle recovery is improved, but the risk of operation in challenging conditions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle recovery efficiencyVSAvoidoperational risk in challenging conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an intermediary approach by implementing multiple layers of software and control systems that mediate between the remote operator and the vehicle's physical operations. This intermediary software layer filters and manages commands, reducing the direct transmission of potentially harmful operations while maintaining recovery productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12417086B2Data communication with remote operation of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.09.16 TOYOTA MOTOR ENG & MFG NORTH AMERICA INC
  • US12417086B2 patent drawing
  • US12417086B2 patent drawing
  • US12417086B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An example operation includes one or more of responsive to an inoperability of a vehicle above a threshold, requesting for the vehicle to be remotely operated, receiving software, by the vehicle, based on the level of inoperability, responsive to an installation of the software on the vehicle, remotely operating the vehicle using the installed software, responsive to the inoperability of the vehicle above the threshold while it is remotely operated, receiving an update to the software, responsive to an installation of the updated software on the vehicle, further remotely operating the vehicle using the installed updated software, and responsive to the inoperability below the threshold, requesting a cessation of the further remote operation of the vehicle.