Remote Vehicle Stop Actuation for Autonomous Emergency Braking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous and semi-autonomous vehicles lack an effective independent emergency stop system that can safely and reliably bring the vehicle to a halt, especially when errant behavior is detected, independent of the vehicle's control systems and without an operator on board.

Innovation Solution

A remote stop system comprising a remote stop actuator and controller that can be activated externally to cease engine power and apply brakes, using a wireless control signal to disconnect the engine from its power source and engage the braking system, with redundant circuits for reliability and independent operation from the vehicle's autonomous systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If autonomous or semi-autonomous vehicles operate without an operator on board, then vehicle automation and operational efficiency are improved, but the ability to safely stop the vehicle in emergency situations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle automationVSAvoidemergency stop capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a remote stop actuator as an intermediary device that enables external operators to stop autonomous vehicles. The actuator receives wireless control signals from remote operators and translates them into physical actions (stopping the engine and applying brakes), serving as a mediator between the autonomous vehicle system and external human intervention when errant behavior is detected

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The remote stop system is segmented into independent components: a remote stop actuator installed on the vehicle, a wireless control signal transmission system, and an independent control circuit that operates separately from the vehicle's autonomous control systems. This segmentation ensures that the emergency stop function remains independent and reliable even when the autonomous control systems fail

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If the remote stop system uses independent circuits separate from vehicle control systems, then reliability and safety are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent operation reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The remote stop function is extracted as a separate, independent system from the vehicle's autonomous control systems. The actuator has its own dedicated control circuits that are physically and functionally separated from the main vehicle control architecture, ensuring that the emergency stop capability does not depend on the reliability of the autonomous control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Reliability

If the remote stop actuator continuously transmits control signals, then vehicle control reliability is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol signal reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuous transmission, the remote stop actuator uses periodic or on-demand signal transmission. The control signal is transmitted continuously during normal operation to maintain readiness, but can be ceased when the vehicle is properly stopped, reducing energy consumption while maintaining control reliability when needed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS20240192683A1Method for remote stop of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.06.13 KODIAK ROBOTICS INC
  • US20240192683A1 patent drawing
  • US20240192683A1 patent drawing
  • US20240192683A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for remotely stopping a vehicle configured to operate autonomously or semi-autonomously. The method includes providing a remote stop system, applying a control signal to the vehicle with the remote stop system, observing an errant behavior of the vehicle, and actuating the remote stop system after observing the errant behavior. The method includes ceasing applying the control signal based on actuating the remote stop system. The method includes stopping the vehicle due to actuating the remote stop system. Actuating the remote stop system, and thus, causing the vehicle to stop, occurs at a location exterior to the vehicle.