Removable Expandable Metal Seal for Well Casing Integrity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for sealing orphaned and abandoned wells, such as using cement, are costly and prevent future access to oil or gas reserves, while also failing to effectively prevent gas emissions like methane from entering the atmosphere.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a camera to locate perforations and microfractures in well casings, followed by the deployment of an expandable metal sealing device with a hydraulic cylinder and shear pin to create a gas-tight seal that can be easily removed for future well reactivation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If cement is used to plug the wellbore, then gas emissions are prevented, but future access to oil or gas is lost and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas emissionsVSAvoidfuture access to oil or gas
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The sealing device transitions from a static cement plug to a dynamic, expandable metal seal that can be activated only when needed. The seal remains removable and can be deployed or removed based on future well usage requirements, providing adaptability while preventing gas emissions during the sealing phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The seal changes its physical state from a rigid cement structure to an expandable metal configuration. The metal seal can be expanded to engage the casing wall for sealing, then contracted or removed to restore access, allowing parameter changes in both physical state and functional capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If cement is used to seal the well, then gas leakage is stopped, but the cost increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegas leakageVSAvoidsealing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive cement sealing with a more economical expandable metal seal that can be deployed and removed relatively easily. The metal seal uses a hydraulic cylinder and shear pin mechanism that is less costly than cement plugging operations and can be reset or removed if needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The sealing device is designed to be self-activating through hydraulic expansion. The hydraulic cylinder automatically expands the metal seal against the casing wall when activated, eliminating the need for complex cement pumping operations and reducing overall sealing costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If an expandable metal seal is used, then future access is maintained, but the sealing reliability must be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuture access to oil or gasVSAvoidseal integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The expandable metal seal utilizes a curved or spherical expansion geometry that allows uniform engagement with the casing wall. The hydraulic cylinder expands the metal seal in a controlled manner, ensuring consistent contact and reliable sealing across the entire seal surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

The seal is pre-positioned within the wellbore cavity, ready for immediate activation. The hydraulic cylinder and shear pin mechanism are pre-assembled to ensure that when activation occurs, the seal engages reliably with the casing wall before any gas leakage can occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If the seal is made removable, then future reactivation is enabled, but the sealing force must be sufficient to prevent gas leakage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewell reactivation capabilityVSAvoidsealing force
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The seal design incorporates asymmetric features where the expansion force is applied in one direction to engage the casing wall, while the removal mechanism acts in the opposite direction. The shear pin is designed to fail at a specific force threshold, allowing easy removal after sealing, but requiring sufficient sealing force during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

Solution Approach 2:

The sealing force is made dynamic rather than static. The hydraulic cylinder can apply high expansion force when needed for sealing, then the system can be deactivated and removed with minimal force. This dynamic capability allows the seal to provide sufficient sealing force during operation while enabling easy removal for future reactivation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach provides a cost-effective and reversible seal that prevents gas leakage, allowing for potential future reactivation of wells while ensuring environmental integrity by thoroughly checking for cross-contamination and maintaining well integrity.

Implementation Method 1

a hydraulic cylinder attached to the sealing device by a shear pin into the well. Expanding the sealing device to engage the casing wall such that a gas seal is made between the sealing device and the casing wall, the sealing device being expanded through engagement by the hydraulic cylinder.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Hydraulic Press

Implementation Method 2

An expandable sealing device is attached to the shear pin with the expandable sealing device being sufficiently expandable to engage the casing wall with sufficient force to shear the shear pin.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS11933134B2Removable oil well seal
Publication Date: 2024.03.19 CAN HLDG LLC
  • US11933134B2 patent drawing
  • US11933134B2 patent drawing
  • US11933134B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of sealing a well having a casing wall comprises transporting a camera into the casing wall making a visual recording by visually recording perforations, microfractures or other breach type damages of the wall and vertical location thereof on the wall. Selecting a vertical location for sealing the well, the vertical location being determined from the visual recording. Transporting an expandable sealing device being made of an expandable metal and a hydraulic cylinder attached to the sealing device by a shear pin into the well. Expanding the sealing device to engage the casing wall such that a gas seal is made between the sealing device and the casing wall, the sealing device being expanded through engagement by the hydraulic cylinder.